Darwin and relativistic kinetic energy correction for hydrogen

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on combining the Darwin correction with the relativistic kinetic energy correction for l=0 in hydrogen to validate the fine structure formula. It is established that the Darwin Hamiltonian primarily affects s-states, where l=0 and j=1/2. The participant expresses uncertainty about the steps needed to demonstrate that the fine structure equation remains valid under these conditions. They seek clarification on whether to combine the corrections and confirm the equation's validity for l=0 and j=1/2. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the implications of these corrections in quantum mechanics.
kraigandrews
Messages
105
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Combine the Darwin correction with the relativistic kinetic energy correction for l=0 to show that the fine structure formula:

\DeltaE_{fs}= - \frac{(E^{(0)2}_{n})}{2mc^{2}}[\frac{4n}{j + 1/2}-3]

remains valid for l=0

Homework Equations



From a previous problem the Darwin hamiltionian is shown to affected only under s-states
where for any s-state the formula \frac{2}{na^{3/2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{4\pi}}

The Attempt at a Solution



so I know for s-states j=1/2 and l=0 (obviously). Overall, I am unsure as to what to show here, meaing:

do I combine the correction for the darwin energy to the correctionn for kinetic energy and then just show that for l=0, j=1/2 the equation still remains valid?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...

Similar threads

Back
Top