I Data from Normal D is Uncorrelated?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter WWGD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Data Normal
WWGD
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
7,679
Reaction score
12,380
Hi All, I am looking at the page http://www.visiondummy.com/2014/04/geometric-interpretation-covariance-matrix/

In which White Noise in 2D is defined as the/a graph of uncorrelated data, so that the associated co. It is sassociated covariance matrix is the identity. It is stated at one point that one such example is that of data drawn from a standard normal. Can anyone see why this is uncorrelated? Is it because the variance has been normalized to 0, or is there something else?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-8-26_16-57-54.png
    upload_2017-8-26_16-57-54.png
    979 bytes · Views: 451
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess you're referring to the statements
Let’s start with unscaled (scale equals 1) and unrotated data. In statistics this is often referred to as ‘white data’ because its samples are drawn from a standard normal distribution and therefore correspond to white (uncorrelated) noise:
[Image]
The covariance matrix of this ‘white’ data equals the identity matrix, such that the variances and standard deviations equal 1 and the covariance equals zero
The data shown in the graph appears to be drawn from a bivariate normal with the identity matrix as covariance matrix, so that it has standard normal marginals and no correlation. The scatterplot is approximately circular, with no apparent trend, as is expected from uncorrelated variates.

I'm afraid I don't fully understand what your question is though.
 
Ah, thanks, I had not seen the assumption in the link of the two variables being uncorrelated, so I did not know why the two were said to be uncorrelated.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top