Data weighting on semi log scale

Click For Summary
When fitting experimental data on a semi-logarithmic scale, it is important to consider the weighting of data points to ensure accurate parameter estimation. Weighing each data point by the inverse of its value or the square of the inverse is a common approach to address imprecision, especially for smaller values. An alternative method suggested is to take the logarithm of the measured values and perform a fit with equal weighting. This can help mitigate issues arising from the nonlinearities present in the data. Proper weighting is crucial for reliable fitting results in luminescence decay studies.
raul_l
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
Hi

I have to perform a fitting procedure on a semi logarithmic scale but I'm not sure how to weigh the experimental data points. I'm studying the decay of the luminescence of a certain type of crystals and the function I'm using has the form

I = \frac{1}{\tau} e^{-\frac{t}{\tau}} \frac{-Li_{2}(-erf(\sqrt{\frac{t}{\tau}})}{erf(\sqrt{\frac{t}{\tau}})}

where Li_{2} and erf are the dilogarithm and error functions. (for simplicity I've omitted some constants). Basically, it's more or less a pure exponential with some nonlinearities at the beginning.

My adviser said that I should try to weigh each data point with the inverse of its value (or the square of inverse). Otherwise I get imprecise values for some of the parameters that depend on the smaller values of the data points. But I'm not sure if this is the right way to do this. It just doesn't feel right.

I was wondering if there are any general rules/guidelines for choosing the correct weights on a semi logarithmic scale.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your advisor is correct. Alternatively, you could take the log of the measured values and do a fit to them, with equal weighting.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K