MHB Dave's Airport Adventure: Find m + n!

  • Thread starter Thread starter veronica1999
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
Dave's airport adventure involves calculating the probability that he walks 400 feet or less to a new gate after his original gate is changed. The problem is set in an airport with twelve gates, each 100 feet apart. The total number of gate combinations is 12X11, leading to a brute force calculation that initially yielded an answer of 52. However, a more refined approach using a grid representation shows that there are 76 valid outcomes, resulting in a probability of 19/33. The final conclusion emphasizes the importance of accurate calculations in probability problems.
veronica1999
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Dave arrives at an airport which has twelve gates arranged in a straight
line with exactly 100 feet between adjacent gates. His departure gate is
assigned at random. After waiting at that gate, Dave is told the departure
gate has been changed to a different gate, again at random. Let the
probability that Dave walks 400 feet or less to the new gate be a fraction
m/n , where m and n are relatively prime positive integers. Find m + n .

I got the answer 52 but I am not that happy with my solution.
(I think I solved it using brute force because the problem was simple)
Can someone show me a better way?

Total choices are 12X11.
I listed all the gates and tried each one out.
4+5 +6 + 7 +8 + 8 +8 +8 +7 + 6 +5 +4 = 76

76/121 = 19/33

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
View attachment 288

The horizontal and the vertical axes represent the first and the second random gates, respectively. The surrounded area represents points (x, y) such that |x - y| ≤ 4. This so because |x - y| ≤ 4 ⇔ -4 ≤ x - y ≤ 4 ⇔ x - 4 ≤ y ≤ x + 4. You need to calculate the number of thick dots. The number of unmarked points on the grid is 2(7 + ... + 1) + 12 = 7 * 8 + 12 = 68, so there are indeed 12 * 12 - 68 = 76 thick dots. The only remark is that 19 / 33 = 76 / 132, not 76 / 121.
 

Attachments

  • gates.png
    gates.png
    4.1 KB · Views: 93
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K