De Broglie Wavelenght of a 5.5Mev

AI Thread Summary
The de Broglie wavelength of a 5.5 MeV alpha particle is calculated using the formula λ = h/p, with p derived from the classical momentum equation. The calculation shows that the wavelength is approximately 6 x 10^-15 m. This value is smaller than the diameter of the Americium-241 nucleus, which is 1.6 x 10^-14 m. The findings suggest that the alpha particle's wavelength could exist within the nucleus. Therefore, it is feasible for the alpha particle to be contained inside the Am-241 nucleus.
diegoarmando
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Calculate the de Broglie wavelenght of a 5.5 Mev alpha particle emitted from Am (241) nucleus, could this particle exist with inside the Am (241) nucleus (diameter = 1.6x10^-14m)?


the wavelenght:
Lambda=h/p = (hc) / (sqrt[2mc^2)xeV)
= 1240 / sqrt(2x3727.38x10^6x5.5x20^6)

?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well...

The alpha particle is nonrelativistic since KE/mc^2 = 10^-3, so you can use the classical formula for momentum p = sqrt(2mKE).

Use this momentum to find the deBroglie wavelength.
 
Use the uncertainty principle to find out the spatial resolution of a particle with this momentum.

(hands wave around)

x ~= h/(4*pi*p)

Is this x larger than the diameter of the nucleus?
 
Last edited:
I find 6x10^-15 m for lambda, so the diameter of Am is 1.6x10^-14, so the wave length is less than the diameter, is that mean the wavelength can be exist inside the Am nucleus?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top