De Broglie wavelength from scattering of neutrons on crystal

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the de Broglie wavelength of neutrons scattering off a crystal with planes 0.33 nm apart, where the first maximum of the diffraction pattern occurs at an angle of 38°. The equation nλ = Dsin∅ is used, with D calculated as 1.014 nm, which corresponds to the spacing of the atoms. The user initially assumes n=1 for the first maximum but struggles with the final wavelength calculation, arriving at an incorrect answer of 0.59 nm. Clarification is needed regarding the distinction between d (spacing of the planes) and D (spacing of the atoms), emphasizing that n=1 is not an assumption but a given for the first maximum.
kachilous
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A certain crystal has a set of planes 0.33 nm apart. A beam of neutrons strikes the crystal at normal incidence and the first maximum of the diffraction pattern occurs at ∅= 38°. What is the de Broglie wavelength of the neutrons?


Homework Equations


nλ = Dsin∅ where D = d / sinα and α = ∅/2


The Attempt at a Solution


First, I found D: D = .33nm / (sin(38/2)) = 1.014
This D corresponds to the spacing of the atoms and the d given in the problem statement
corresponds to the spacing of the planes in the crystal.

I assume n = 1. Then λ = 1.014 nm * sin(38) = .624
The answer .59. What am I doing wrong?

The only thing that I can think of that I might be doing wrong is my n is incorrect.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kachilous said:
nλ = Dsin∅ where D = d / sinα and α = ∅/2

First, I found D: D = .33nm / (sin(38/2)) = 1.014
This D corresponds to the spacing of the atoms and the d given in the problem statement
corresponds to the spacing of the planes in the crystal.
There's some confusion here between d and D. Make sure you have clear in your head what each of these is.
Looks to me like you only need your first equation.
Btw, n=1 is not an assumption - it is implied by first maximum.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top