De Moivre's theorem in Cartesian form.

goodluck90
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey Guys,

I've been passed this from a friend to help them out, but I don't know much about it. So this is a bit of annoying first post... SORRY!

Homework Statement



if z = √2 + i, use de Moivre's theorem to find z^5 in Cartesian form.


AND.

Convert z = -8 + 8 √3 i to polar form.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



No attempt - I know that's really cheeky, but it's not my work :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Um, have you asked your friend if they've attempted to apply the formulae they've been given? De Moivre's formula is (\cos x+i\sin x)^n=\cos (nx)+i\sin(nx). The value for z that your friend has been given should be converted to work with the formula. Also, the second value for z can easily be converted to polar coordinates given a geometric understanding of complex numbers. I won't give the answers; it is difficult to tell how much to help if I have know information as to how your friend has progressed.

Just as an edit, let me just say that, given Euler's formula, converting back and forth between polar and cartesian form should be relatively trivial. If this doesn't make sense, let me know.
 
Last edited:
lineintegral1 said:
Um, have you asked your friend if they've attempted to apply the formulae they've been given? De Moivre's formula is (\cos x+i\sin x)^n=\cos (nx)+i\sin(nx). The value for z that your friend has been given should be converted to work with the formula. Also, the second value for z can easily be converted to polar coordinates given a geometric understanding of complex numbers. I won't give the answers; it is difficult to tell how much to help if I have know information as to how your friend has progressed.

Just as an edit, let me just say that, given Euler's formula, converting back and forth between polar and cartesian form should be relatively trivial. If this doesn't make sense, let me know.

Yeah - I can understand how it doesn't help much - that's all the information I was given 'I can't do these two questions'.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top