Death penalty - to tell or not to tell?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BenVitale
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Death
AI Thread Summary
Japan's recent execution of two death row inmates highlights the country's ongoing support for capital punishment, with 107 inmates currently awaiting execution. The practice in Japan involves not informing prisoners of their execution dates, a point of contention in discussions about the ethics of such a policy. Many argue that not knowing when an execution will occur constitutes cruel and unusual punishment, as it creates a state of perpetual anxiety. The conversation extends to the medical field, questioning whether terminally ill patients should be informed about their prognosis. Some believe that knowledge allows for closure and preparation, while others argue that it may lead to despair and a loss of hope. The discussion emphasizes the balance between honesty and compassion in both the justice and healthcare systems, with a focus on the psychological impact of withholding information. Ultimately, the complexities of justice and the ethics of punishment are central to the debate, raising questions about the necessity of suffering in the context of capital punishment.
BenVitale
Messages
72
Reaction score
1
BBC News : Japan hangs two death row inmates

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-10785131

Opinion polls show broad support for capital punishment in Japan.
......
A total of 107 inmates remain on death row in Japan. Prisoners are usually executed two or three at a time.
.......
Prisoners are not told when they will be executed and their relatives are told only after the sentence has been carried out.


My question :

In Japan, prisoners are not told when they will be executed. So, what is worse, to be told or not to be told?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To be told, especially when last minute reprieves can move it till a later date. I think it would be hell, preparing yourself to die only to be told not yet, then going through it all again, over and over.
 
To tell or not to tell? I'm not sure.

But according to this article:

http://www.victimsofviolence.on.ca/rev2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=327&Itemid=17

Not knowing when or if you will be executed is cruel and unusual punishment.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Maybe slightly less macabre, should doctors tell their terminal patients the news and if so how much time they have left?
 
skeptic2 said:
Maybe slightly less macabre, should doctors tell their terminal patients the news and if so how much time they have left?

Since I'm not a doctor, I went to http://www.healthcaremagic.com/healthpage/Does-a-doctor-have-to-tell-a-patient-he-is-dying

And, http://www.healthcaremagic.com/community/Hypertension-and-Heart-Disease/Does-a-doctor-have-to-tell-a-patient-he-is-dying-/21085]Does a doctor have to tell a patient he is dying

It says, No.

What good does it do to tell? I think it's better not to tell, the doctor could be wrong, and the patient recovers ... by telling, the patient will just give up.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think it would be worse not to be told because you would know it could be coming any day so you would worry if today was you day.
 
John Creighto said:
I think it would be worse not to be told because you would know it could be coming any day so you would worry if today was you day.
That is what you won't do.

Let 3-4 days of agitation pass, and human optimism shows itself, and you think no more of it.

To maintain mental equilibrium is a strong psychic need for humans, living in "needless" anguish is anti-thetical to that.

Not that I hereby have said I endorse execution, or for that matter, the Japanese way of doing it.
 
There is an ethical basis for the right to fair and public trial. Informing people of all aspects of their punishment, including the possibility and reasons an execution could be re-scheduled should be included in that, I think. Cruelty in punishment is not necessary or desirable. If someone is already giving up their life to pay for crimes committed, why should they suffer beyond that? Of course, try to tell that to the people who lost loved ones due to their crime. Even though cruel and unusual punishment is supposed to be illegal, it seems to be the only means to evoke a sense of satisfaction or forgiveness in the victims, and even then may not be enough. Justice is very complex.
 
I would want to know if I was to be executed. That way one could try to make some sort of peace before death. To find out right before the execution that you were going to die would be too much to handle.
Now let's look at it from the other way. If a guy murdered a member of my family I would hope he would know the execution was coming so would have to spend the rest of his life thinking about how much (exact) time he had left.

As for doctors with terminal patients I would hope that they would tell the truth. (I have some personal experience with this one). If I only had a few days to live I would want to make sure I was able to see all of my friends and family. Plus, being given false hope makes loved ones feel completely blindsided when the person actually dies (even though they are not truly blindsided, it does feel that way).
 
  • #10
DR13 said:
As for doctors with terminal patients I would hope that they would tell the truth. (I have some personal experience with this one). If I only had a few days to live I would want to make sure I was able to see all of my friends and family. Plus, being given false hope makes loved ones feel completely blindsided when the person actually dies (even though they are not truly blindsided, it does feel that way).

If you were a doctor, wouldn't it be very tough to tell a patient he is dying?

Haven't doctors seen time and time again patients living much longer than predicted or dying much sooner?

Aren't doctors notoriously bad at predicting how much time a patient has left?

Their predictions are based on statistics

Isn't it part of their jobs to give hope and sense of security?
 
  • #11
BenVitale said:
If you were a doctor, wouldn't it be very tough to tell a patient he is dying?

Haven't doctors seen time and time again patients living much longer than predicted or dying much sooner?

Aren't doctors notoriously bad at predicting how much time a patient has left?

Their predictions are based on statistics

Isn't it part of their jobs to give hope and sense of security?

1. So what if it's tough? Doctors are paid to do this. It is part of the job description.
2. This is true but the patient also has a right to know the condition of their own body.
3. I wouldn't say this is true. Sure, some patients defy the odds but doctors often give cancer patients the 5 year survival rate to illustrate their condition.
4. So?
5. There is a fine line between giving hope and lying to a patient.
 

Similar threads

Replies
409
Views
44K
Replies
6
Views
14K
Replies
33
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
7K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Back
Top