Find N for Isotope with 10.84 Day Half-Life

  • Thread starter Thread starter dinospamoni
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay Isotope
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the number of atoms needed for an isotope with a half-life of 10.84 days to achieve an activity of 1.79 micro-Ci. The decay constant was calculated as 7.401 x 10^-7 1/s, and the decay rate was initially miscalculated due to incorrect conversion of micro-Ci to decays per second. The correct conversion shows that 1.79 micro-Ci equals approximately 6.62 x 10^4 decays per second. The final calculations for the number of atoms required were adjusted based on this corrected decay rate. Accurate conversions and the right equations are crucial for solving such problems effectively.
dinospamoni
Messages
90
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The half life of a particular isotope is 10.84 days. Find the number of atoms of this isotope that would be necessary to produce a sample with an activity of 1.79 micro-Ci.

Homework Equations



R=N_{0} \lambda e^{-\lambda t}

where R is the decay rate
lambda is the decay constant
N is the number of atoms
and t is the half life

The Attempt at a Solution



First I converted the half life to seconds: 936576 s

than I solved for the decay rate constant: lambda= 7.401*10^-7 1/s

and R is 1.79*10^-6 Ci = 1.79*10^-6 decays/second

When I plugged these values into the equation though, I get 4.84, which is wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dinospamoni said:

Homework Statement



The half life of a particular isotope is 10.84 days. Find the number of atoms of this isotope that would be necessary to produce a sample with an activity of 1.79 micro-Ci.

Homework Equations



R=N_{0} \lambda e^{-\lambda t}

where R is the decay rate
lambda is the decay constant
N is the number of atoms
and t is the half life

The Attempt at a Solution



First I converted the half life to seconds: 936576 s

than I solved for the decay rate constant: lambda= 7.401*10^-7 1/s

and R is 1.79*10^-6 Ci = 1.79*10^-6 decays/second

When I plugged these values into the equation though, I get 4.84, which is wrong.
Which equation did you plug these values into?

What did you use for t ?
 
I'm not sure how I messed that up, but I totally didn't use that equation.

What I actually did was solve for lambda and then used the equation

N_{0} = \frac{R_0}{\lambda}

and got N to be 2.418, but that's wrong
 
According to Wikipedia,

"The Curie (symbol Ci) is a non-SI unit of radioactivity, named after Marie and Pierre Curie.[1][2] It is defined as

1 Ci = 3.7 × 10^10 decays per second. "

1 micro-Ci = 3.7E4 decays /sec so R should be 1.79 X 3.7E4 = 6.62 E4.

Maybe this is the problem
 
Deleted post.

It gave the answer to a Homework problem.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That is definitely the problem. Thanks a ton!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top