Deceleration of a man falling off a cliff into snow

AI Thread Summary
A man falling from a height of 37.8 m experiences a deceleration of approximately 980 m/s² upon landing in snow. The discussion focuses on calculating how deep he would be buried based on this deceleration. Initial calculations suggest a final velocity of 27.2 m/s upon impact, but there is confusion regarding the time taken to stop and the distance traveled in the snow. Participants emphasize the importance of using the correct equations of motion and suggest reviewing the SUVAT equations for clarity. The problem requires careful consideration of both distance and velocity to arrive at the correct answer.
salmayoussef
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A person can just survive a full-body collision (either to the front, back, or side) which results in a deceleration that is up about 100 g's. (One g is 9.8 m/s/s). At greater deceleration fatal brain damage will likely occur. If a 66.4 kg man falls of a cliff of height 37.8 m but manages to land flat on his back in soft snow, undergoing a constant deceleration of this magnitude, how deep would he be buried in the snow?

I feel like this is very simple and I'm just over thinking it...

dy = 37.8 m
g = -980 m/s2

(Not sure about g...)

Homework Equations



Possibly one of the constant acceleration equations (not sure which).

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to think about it as if the man was a car driving horizontally then suddenly begins to decelerate, then tried to find his distance after he breaks. No luck. I still can't figure it out... Any advice would be appreciated! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
salmayoussef said:
g = -980 m/s2

(Not sure about g...)
Why would you be "not sure"? In the problem it says "(One g is 9.8 m/s/s)"

You know that v= gt where v is the speed after t seconds and d= (g/2)t^2 where d is the distance traveled in t seconds. How long will it take to fall 37.8 m? (I assume that is the distance to the top of the snowbank.) What will his speed be at that point (as he hits the snow bank).

At -100g= -980 m/s^2 (was that what you meant, not "g= -980 m/s2"?) how long will it take for him to stop (his speed to become 0)? And how far will he have gone through the snow in that time?
 
Well, I tried it out using d = 0.5gt2 and found that the time is 2.78 s.

Then using time, I found that the final velocity was 27.2 m/s. (v = gt)

Then for the snow portion, I tried to find time using the same equation and got 0.028 s which I don't think is right. Waaaaay too fast!

And finally, I used d = 0.5(Vf+Vi)t to find that d = 0.38 m. But it isn't the proper answer! Any advice?
 
salmayoussef said:
Well, I tried it out using d = 0.5gt2 and found that the time is 2.78 s.

Then using time, I found that the final velocity was 27.2 m/s. (v = gt)

Then for the snow portion, I tried to find time using the same equation and got 0.028 s which I don't think is right. Waaaaay too fast!
Show your working so we can see where you may be going wrong. Or confirm that you're right.
 
The equation d = 0.5gt^2 looks like a variant of the SUVAT equations of motion. This problem is mostly about distance and velocity so why use one that involves time? That's not the wrong approach but it might be worth you looking at some of the others.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equations_of_motion#SUVAT_equations
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top