Deck of Cards and Planck Time?

nicholasfouss
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Deck of Cards and Planck Time?

This is truly unbelievable. I've checked my work multiple times, gotten it checked by others, and still the same answer remains.

There are more ways to rearrange a single deck of cards than there have been Planck times since the Universe began.

Number of formations of a single deck of cards:
52! = 52 x 51 x 50 x 49 ... 3 x 2 x 1
52! \approx 8.066 x 10^{}67

Number of Planck times (tp) since the Universe began (assuming the Universe is approx. 16 billion years old, which is generous):
(1 x 10^{}44) x (60) x (60) x (24) x (365.5) x (1.6 x 10^{}10) \approx 5.053 x 10^{}61

(tp in a sec)(sec in min)(min in hr)(hr in day)(day in yr)(yr since singularity)

8.066 x 10^{}67 > 5.053 x 10^{}61

Keep in mind, a Planck time is the time it takes for light (in a vacuum) to travel a Planck length (1.6 x 10^{}-35 metres.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Now, think about how many possible games (that is: entire games) of chess there are.
 


Are you trying to make a point about something related to quantum physics?
or just stating the vastness of possibilities in a deck of cards?
 


Another "unbelievable" fact:
The age of universe in years is of the same order of magnitude as the number of people on Earth. They will probably become equal in the next 100 years or so.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top