Decoherence and the Density Matrix

captain_clogs
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I've been reading the seminal Zurek papers on decoherence but there is one (crucial) point on which I am confused. I understand the mathematical demonstrations that over very short timescales the superpositions of states represented as off-diagonal terms in the density matrix can be shown to go to zero over very short timescales due to interaction of the apparatus/system with the environment, leaving a diagonal density matrix. However, why exactly does a diagonal density matrix mean that we can never measure a superposition of states?

Thanks for any insight!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To be able to measure the superposition means to be able to measure the relative PHASE between different components of the superposition. For example, the superposition
|a>+|b>
is very different from the superposition
|a>-|b>
In the first case the relative phase factor is +1, while in the second it is -1.

If you write down the density matrix for these two superpositions, you will see that their diagonal matrix elements are the same, while they differ in the off-diagonal matrix elements. In other words, the information about the relative phase is encoded in the off-diagonal matrix elements. Thus, by destroying the off-diagonal matrix elements you destroy the information about the relative phase, which implies that you cannot see the superposition. Instead of a superposition above with a well defined relative phase, you have a mixture
|a> or |b>
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top