Decoherence Time Scale for Different Qubit Realizations

gioialorusso
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,
I've searched all the internet but I can't find the answer to my question. Which are times of decoherence for different physical realization of a qubit? Like, if I use photons, or spin electron, or nuclei, or ion trap, to encode a qubit, which are times of decoherence for each?
Thank you for now,
Gioia
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It can be everything from the order of 1 fs to 1 s.
The time does not only depend on the system used, but also how it is implemented and probed so it is difficult to give any generic answers.
 
yeah, i know it, but i have really to give some numbers for each particle, and I don't know where to find them... Hope someone has some estimation about the question. thanks for now.
 
You just have to look up the relevant papers. Things move fast in this field, so what was "state of the art" a few years ago is already dated (i.e. don't bother looking in books).

Just to give you an example: superconducting qubits (which is what I am most familiar with) have gone from having a coherence time of about 10 ns to at least 10 us in just over ten years, and there has been almost one order of magnitude improvement just in the past few years due to improved sample design.
 
Last edited:
I'll try to search better about optical quantum computation and ion traps. :)
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top