Decomposable Tensors Problem: V Vector Space Dim ≤ 3

  • Thread starter Thread starter Canavar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tensors
Canavar
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Problem:
V a vector space with dimV \le 3, then every homogeneous element in \Lambda(V) is decomposable.


So, this exercise doesn't sound very difficult. My problem is, that i don't know the definition of homogeneous and decomposable. Can you please help me?
Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A homogeneous element of \Lambda(V) is a form of definite degree, p. A decomposable form is one that can be written as a single exterior product of two forms of lower degree \omega = \mu \wedge \nu.
 
Hello,

Thank you for your help!
are these examples correct?:
For dimV=2 We have \Lambda(V) = IK \times T^1(V) \times T^2(V).

-Then a homogeneous elm. would be all elm. in v\in \IK or v\in T^1(V) or v\in T^2(V).
Where T is the Alternator.

-Is it allowed to use the single exterior product of two form of equal degree, i.e. v=\mü \wedge \tau with v,\mü,\tau \in T^1(V) for instance?


Thanks
 
Canavar said:
Hello,

Thank you for your help!
are these examples correct?:
For dimV=2 We have \Lambda(V) = IK \times T^1(V) \times T^2(V).

-Then a homogeneous elm. would be all elm. in v\in \IK or v\in T^1(V) or v\in T^2(V).
Where T is the Alternator.

Yes a homogeneous element would be in T^p(V) for some p.

-Is it allowed to use the single exterior product of two form of equal degree, i.e. v=\mü \wedge \tau with v,\mü,\tau \in T^1(V) for instance?

Yes it is possible that the decomposition involves forms of equal degree. However, in your example, if \mu, \tau \in T^1(V), then v= \mu \wedge\tau\in T^2(V).
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top