I Decomposing a density matrix of a mixed ensemble

Gabriel Maia
Messages
70
Reaction score
1
I'm trying to solve a problem where I am given a few matrices and asked to determine if they could be density matrices or not and if they are if they represent pure or mixed ensembles. In the case of mixed ensembles, I should find a decomposition in terms of a sum of pure ensembles. The matrix I'm having trouble with is this one

\rho = \left[\begin{array}{ccc}\frac{1}{2} & 0 & \frac{1}{4} \\ 0 & \frac{1}{4} & 0 \\ \frac{1}{4} & 0 & \frac{1}{4}\end{array}\right]

I know it's a mixed ensemble density matrix because $Tr(\rho^2)<1$, but how can I decompose if I don't even know how big is this sum? I mean, any number of pure states may compose a mixed ensemble since they do not need to be orthogonal. How can I approach this?Thank you very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gabriel Maia said:
I'm trying to solve a problem where I am given a few matrices and asked to determine if they could be density matrices or not and if they are if they represent pure or mixed ensembles. In the case of mixed ensembles, I should find a decomposition in terms of a sum of pure ensembles. The matrix I'm having trouble with is this one

\rho = \left[\begin{array}{ccc}\frac{1}{2} &amp; 0 &amp; \frac{1}{4} \\ 0 &amp; \frac{1}{4} &amp; 0 \\ \frac{1}{4} &amp; 0 &amp; \frac{1}{4}\end{array}\right]

I know it's a mixed ensemble density matrix because $Tr(\rho^2)<1$, but how can I decompose if I don't even know how big is this sum? I mean, any number of pure states may compose a mixed ensemble since they do not need to be orthogonal. How can I approach this?Thank you very much.

Is this homework? If so, it should be in the homework forum.

What you're looking for is an orthonormal basis |\psi_j\rangle such that \rho = \sum_j p_j |\psi_j\rangle \langle \psi_j|, where the p_j are all real, and add up to 1. Now consider the product:

\rho |\psi_k\rangle = \sum_j p_j |\psi_j\rangle \langle \psi_j | \psi_k \rangle = p_k |\psi_k\rangle

where for the last equality, we used that the kets |\psi_j\rangle are orthonormal, meaning that \langle \psi_j | \psi_k \rangle = \delta_{jk}

So what that means is that the basis vector |\psi_k\rangle and the coefficient p_k are solvable as an eigenvalue problem:

\rho |\psi_k\rangle = p_k |\psi_k\rangle

Do you know how to find the eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors of a square matrix?
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Gabriel Maia said:
I know it's a mixed ensemble density matrix because $Tr(\rho^2)<1$, but how can I decompose if I don't even know how big is this sum? I mean, any number of pure states may compose a mixed ensemble since they do not need to be orthogonal. How can I approach this?

The problem only asks you to find a sum, so any sum will do. Their purifications to a larger Hilbert space with fixed dimension will all be related by unitary matrices via the HJW theorem: https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0305068
 
stevendaryl said:
Is this homework? If so, it should be in the homework forum.

What you're looking for is an orthonormal basis |\psi_j\rangle such that \rho = \sum_j p_j |\psi_j\rangle \langle \psi_j|, where the p_j are all real, and add up to 1. Now consider the product:

\rho |\psi_k\rangle = \sum_j p_j |\psi_j\rangle \langle \psi_j | \psi_k \rangle = p_k |\psi_k\rangle

where for the last equality, we used that the kets |\psi_j\rangle are orthonormal, meaning that \langle \psi_j | \psi_k \rangle = \delta_{jk}

So what that means is that the basis vector |\psi_k\rangle and the coefficient p_k are solvable as an eigenvalue problem:

\rho |\psi_k\rangle = p_k |\psi_k\rangle

Do you know how to find the eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors of a square matrix?

By considering that \langle \psi_j|\psi_{k} \rangle = \delta_{j\,k} aren't we assuming that all the states that form the density matrix are orthogonal?
 
Gabriel Maia said:
By considering that \langle \psi_j|\psi_{k} \rangle = \delta_{j\,k} aren't we assuming that all the states that form the density matrix are orthogonal?

Well, yes. But if there is any solution, there is a solution of that form.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top