Decomposition of apriodic and periodic signals

AI Thread Summary
The decomposition of periodic composite signals results in discrete frequencies due to the finite period of the signal, where adjacent frequency components are separated by Mπ/T. In contrast, aperiodic signals can be viewed as having an infinitely long period, leading to a separation between frequency components that approaches zero. This results in a continuous frequency spectrum for aperiodic signals. The key concept is that the period of the signal directly influences the spacing of frequency components in the frequency domain. Understanding this distinction is essential for analyzing signal behavior in different contexts.
Geek007
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi there,
why the decomposition of periodic Composite signal give discrete frequencies and decomposition of aperiodic signal give continuous(in decimal) frequencies. please kindly do explain the concept behind in as simple words possible.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One hand wavy argument makes use the period of the signal as the key tool. Let's say there is a periodic signal with period ##T##, then in the frequency domain, adjacent frequency components are separated by ##M\pi/T## where ##M## is an integer. As for a nonperiodic signal, we can view it as a periodic signal with infinitely long period, ##T \to \infty##. Therefore, the separation between adjacent frequency components will be ##\lim_{T\to \infty} M\pi/T = 0##, yielding a continuous spectrum.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top