Decompostion of conditional probabilities

torquerotates
Messages
207
Reaction score
0
So If B=B1UB2U...UBn would Pr(A|B)=Pr(A|B1)Pr(B1)+Pr(A|B2)Pr(B2)+...+Pr(A|Bn)Pr(Bn)?

I haven't found a formula for this but it makes intuitive sense.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
torquerotates said:
So If B=B1UB2U...UBn would Pr(A|B)=Pr(A|B1)Pr(B1)+Pr(A|B2)Pr(B2)+...+Pr(A|Bn)Pr(Bn)?

I haven't found a formula for this but it makes intuitive sense.

Hey torquerotates.

Before I give my take on the answer, do you assume that all the B1, B2, etc are disjoint? In other words is Bi AND Bj = NullSet for i != j?
 
Yes they are disjoint.
 
torquerotates said:
Yes they are disjoint.

For two events I get the following:

P(A|B1UB2) = P(A and (B1UB2))/P(B1UB2) = P((A and B1) U (A and B2))/P(B1UB2) = P(A and B1)/P(B1UB2) + P(A and B2)/P(B1UB2) - P(A and B1 and B2)/P(B1UB2)

= P(A and B1)/(P(B1) + P(B2)) + P(A and B1)/(P(B1) + P(B2)) - 0

= 1/P(B)[P(A and B1) + P(A and B2)]

= 1/P(B)[P(A and B1]P(B1)/P(B1) + P(A and B2)P(B2)/P(B2)]

= 1/P(B)[P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)] if we assume P(Bi) > 0 and is a valid probability.

If the above is right then your answer is wrong in general but right when B is the universal probability space.

Because your probability P(B) may not be one, it means that the above needs to be corrected using this information. Just for an example consider P(B1) = P(B2) = 1/4 and P(A|B1) = P(A|B2). But since 1/4[P(A|B1) + P(A|B2)] = 1/2P(A|B) for this example since P(B1) = P(B2) and since B1 and B2 are disjoint we have:

Then under these conditions we have:

1/P(B) x [P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)]
= 1/(1/2) x [P(A|B1)x1/4 + P(A|B1)x1/4]
=(1/4)/(1/2) x [P(A|B1) + P(A|B2)]
= 1/2 x [(1/2)/(1/4)]xP(A|B)
= 1/2 x 2 x P(A|B)
= P(A|B) for this example.

If we did not 'normalize' by P(B) we would not have gotten the right answer.

While I think the above is right, I would like others to check if they could just to make sure, but I'm only using a few identities which are basically distribution over sets and multiplication by 'x/x' terms for P(Bi)/P(Bi).
 
torquerotates said:
it makes intuitive sense.

Did you do any examples?

Let
A = the roll of a fair die produces an even number
B = the face that comes up is a 1 or a 2
B1 = the face that comes up is a 1
B2 = the face that comes up is a 2
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...

Similar threads

Back
Top