Decreasing Ambient Heat w/ Heat Sink

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dryerasethis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    decreasing
AI Thread Summary
A heat sink placed in a sealed container will initially absorb heat as the ambient temperature rises, but it will quickly reach thermal equilibrium with the ambient, reducing its efficiency in heat absorption. In traditional applications, heat sinks can dissipate heat into the atmosphere, which acts as an infinite heat sink, unlike the sealed environment. If a method is implemented to transfer heat from the heat sink externally, it could reverse the roles of the air and heat sink. The effectiveness of this setup depends on the design of the heat sink, as not all shapes are optimal for both absorption and dissipation. Ultimately, the heat sink's performance will be influenced by its ability to transfer heat out of the sealed system.
Dryerasethis
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
This is a short conceptual question.

If I place a heat sink in a sealed container, and than raise the ambient temperature in the container, will the heat sink absorb the heat with somewhere close to the same efficiency as it would being used in the traditional application (dispersing it's heat into the ambient)?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps initially, but very quickly, the heat sink will have the same temperature as the ambient, and there won't be any effective absorption anymore.

In the traditional application, this situation is never attained, because the heat sink can always radiate to the ambient, which itself transfers heat to the practically infinite atmosphere (the true "heat sink").
 
But the heat sink is going to absorb the excess heat in the ambient? And so if I have a way to transfer the heat sink's heat out of the system externally I could effectively reverse the roles of the air and the heat sink in their traditional applications?

Thanks for answering!
 
Last edited:
Yes, a heat sink works basically the same whether absorbing or dissipating heat.
 
Sure, heat naturally goes from hot to cold if transfer is possible (whether by conduction, convection or radiation), and generally, the more surface the better. The way you choose to transfer the heat from the heat sink out of the system is practically a leak in your otherwise sealed container.

There are many designs to heat sinks though, and I can't confirm which shape is better for your particular system. The optimal heatsink (shape for instance) for emitting in the atmosphere isn't necessarily the best for your inverted application.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Thread 'Does Poisson's equation hold due to vector potential cancellation?'
Imagine that two charged particles, with charge ##+q##, start at the origin and then move apart symmetrically on the ##+y## and ##-y## axes due to their electrostatic repulsion. The ##y##-component of the retarded Liénard-Wiechert vector potential at a point along the ##x##-axis due to the two charges is $$ \begin{eqnarray*} A_y&=&\frac{q\,[\dot{y}]_{\mathrm{ret}}}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 c^2[(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}+y\dot{y}/c]_{\mathrm{ret}}}\tag{1}\\...
Back
Top