Deducing Maclaurin series converges from Leibniz formula

sr3056
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Given f(x) = xe-x2 I can differentiate once and use Leibniz to show that for n greater than 1

f(n) = -2nf(n-2) - 2xf(n-1)

I want to show that the Maclaurin series for f(x) converges for all x.

At x = 0, the above Leibniz formula becomes f(n) = -2nf(n-2)

I know that f(0) = zero so this implies that even terms of Maclaurin series are zero, whilst
f(1)(0) = 1, f(3)(0) = -6*1 = -6, f(5)(0) = -10*-6*1 = 60 and so on.

I assume that to show convergence, I need to find a formula for the nth term of the Maclaurin series, then use the ratio test to show that terms are decreasing. I can see the pattern (the derivative increases by a factor of 2(2n + 1) each time) but am unsure how to express this in a formula. Perhaps using factorials?

Thanks for any help.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hey sr3056 and welcome to the forums.

One suggestion is to use the Mclaurin series expansion for e^(-x^2) and then multiply all terms by x. So you start by expanding e^(-x) and then replace every x by an x^2, and multiply each term by x.

The above should give you a series expansion which should allow you to do a further test for convergence.
 
Thanks. Is there no way of proving convergence from the Leibniz formula though?
 
If you get a series that is the correct definition, then you should be able to do what you said (i.e. the ratio test), so as long as you get the correct series expansion, it will be OK.

Both series expansions should be equal though and testing this will test whether your above approach is the same as the one I discussed above.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
48
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top