Deducing Maclaurin series converges from Leibniz formula

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on demonstrating the convergence of the Maclaurin series for the function f(x) = xe^(-x^2) using the Leibniz formula. The user differentiates f(x) and applies the formula to derive a relationship for the derivatives at x = 0, noting that even terms are zero while odd terms yield specific values. To establish convergence, they plan to find a formula for the nth term of the Maclaurin series and apply the ratio test, although they express uncertainty about formulating this correctly. A suggestion is made to utilize the Maclaurin series expansion for e^(-x^2) and multiply by x to facilitate convergence testing. The conversation emphasizes the importance of ensuring both series expansions align to validate the approach.
sr3056
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Given f(x) = xe-x2 I can differentiate once and use Leibniz to show that for n greater than 1

f(n) = -2nf(n-2) - 2xf(n-1)

I want to show that the Maclaurin series for f(x) converges for all x.

At x = 0, the above Leibniz formula becomes f(n) = -2nf(n-2)

I know that f(0) = zero so this implies that even terms of Maclaurin series are zero, whilst
f(1)(0) = 1, f(3)(0) = -6*1 = -6, f(5)(0) = -10*-6*1 = 60 and so on.

I assume that to show convergence, I need to find a formula for the nth term of the Maclaurin series, then use the ratio test to show that terms are decreasing. I can see the pattern (the derivative increases by a factor of 2(2n + 1) each time) but am unsure how to express this in a formula. Perhaps using factorials?

Thanks for any help.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hey sr3056 and welcome to the forums.

One suggestion is to use the Mclaurin series expansion for e^(-x^2) and then multiply all terms by x. So you start by expanding e^(-x) and then replace every x by an x^2, and multiply each term by x.

The above should give you a series expansion which should allow you to do a further test for convergence.
 
Thanks. Is there no way of proving convergence from the Leibniz formula though?
 
If you get a series that is the correct definition, then you should be able to do what you said (i.e. the ratio test), so as long as you get the correct series expansion, it will be OK.

Both series expansions should be equal though and testing this will test whether your above approach is the same as the one I discussed above.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
48
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top