Defining Electric Field around a charge

AI Thread Summary
The electric field around a charge is defined as the force experienced per unit charge, specifically measured using a test charge. Introducing a test charge does disturb the original field, but this disturbance is minimized by using a very small test charge. This approach allows for an accurate measurement of the electric field due to other charges in the system. It is important to note that an object cannot exert a force on itself, which clarifies the relationship between force and field. Ultimately, the electric field is assessed in the limit as the test charge approaches zero to ensure minimal disturbance.
Phynite
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Electric field around a charge or system of charges is defined as the force experienced per unit charge. Won't the original field be disturbed by the test charge's own field ? How then the original field be measured accurately ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm...How do I way this? Force and field are related concepts but not entirely the same thing.

First of all you would be right to say that the field in some space would be altered if you introduce a test charge or any charge for that matter into the "picture" and if I throw in another charge into the space, the field will change as a result. However when you measure a field, what you are essentially doing is probing the force per unit charge that your test charge experiences due solely to the contribution of the other charges in the system. You must remember that the an object cannot exert a force on itself .

I'm terrible at explaining stuff but hope this helps!
 
Last edited:
Phynite said:
Electric field around a charge or system of charges is defined as the force experienced per unit [test] charge

...in the limit as the magnitude of the test charge approaches zero.
 
Yes, the original field will be disturbed by the test charge's own field.
It is considered that the value of the test charge taken is very low i.e. the minimum value of the test charge is taken so that the disturbance in the original field is minimum and this minimum disturbance can be neglected.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top