Defining Speed = Distance/Time, or ||Displacement||/Time?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ahyaa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed
AI Thread Summary
Speed can be defined in two ways: as the distance traveled over time or as the magnitude of velocity, which is based on displacement over time. Distance is path-dependent, while displacement measures the net change in position, leading to different implications for average speed and average velocity. Average speed refers to the total distance divided by time, whereas average velocity can be zero if the net displacement is zero, as seen in a complete circular path. Instantaneous speed, however, reflects the speed at a specific moment and matches the magnitude of instantaneous velocity. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurately discussing speed in both everyday language and physics contexts.
ahyaa
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Given that distance is path-dependent and displacement measures only the net change, how do we define speed?

I have seen speed defined as 1) distance over time, and 2) the magnitude of velocity. I recognize that these are two different things because distance is path-dependent while velocity = displacement/time and displacement measures net change. Thus, which definition is the accepted definition for speed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Speed", in physics, is a technical term referring to the magnitude of the velocity vector.
In common language it has a number of different uses - most commonly referring to the distance traveled divided by the time taken.
In physics this second one would be properly called the average speed, but you need to watch for non-technical language.

Notice that if you complete a circle, then the displacement is zero, so the average velocity is zero so the speed was zero - even if you traveled in that circle very fast.

Note: "distance" would be the magnitude of the displacement vector - but there are other kinds of distances - in common language "distance" can mean the separation of two locations (also called "as the crow flies") or it can be the length of the path traveled for example.
 
ahyaa said:
I have seen speed defined as 1) distance over time,

As Simon noted, this is the average speed during the specified time interval.

and 2) the magnitude of velocity.

This is the instantaneous speed at some point in time, provided that we use the instantaneous velocity at that point in time.

velocity = displacement/time and displacement measures net change

This gives you the average velocity during the specified time interval.

In general, the average speed during a specified time interval does not equal the magnitude of the average velocity during that time interval; whereas the instantaneous speed at any point in time equals the magnitude of the instantaneous velocity at that point in time.

In Simon's example, if you go around a complete circle at constant speed, then your average speed for the entire circle equals that constant speed, but your average velocity is zero because your net displacement is zero. Your instantaneous speed at every point on the circle equals that constant speed, and therefore the magnitude of the instantaneous velocity is the same at every point; but your direction changes continuously as you move around the circle, so your instantaneous velocity (which includes both magnitude and direction) is different at every point on the circle.
 
Got it, thank you all
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top