Definite integral: why is this wrong?
- Thread starter tahayassen
- Start date
Click For Summary
Homework Help Overview
The discussion revolves around the evaluation of a definite integral and the interpretation of the expression (-1)^(2/3). Participants are exploring the complexities of evaluating integrals involving cube roots and complex numbers.
Discussion Character
- Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed
Approaches and Questions Raised
- Participants discuss the discrepancies in results from Wolfram Alpha and question why (-1)^(2/3) does not evaluate to 1. There are mentions of different interpretations of cube roots and the implications of choosing branches in complex analysis.
Discussion Status
The conversation is ongoing, with participants sharing various interpretations and approaches to the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the selection of branches for cube roots, and there is an acknowledgment of multiple valid answers based on different assumptions.
Contextual Notes
There are references to the need for clarity in defining the branch of the cube root being used, as well as the implications of evaluating integrals with complex components. The original poster's approach is noted as potentially valid, but interpretations vary.
Similar threads
- · Replies 12 ·
- · Replies 4 ·
- · Replies 6 ·
- · Replies 3 ·
- · Replies 1 ·
- · Replies 105 ·
- · Replies 4 ·