1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Definition of a plane-polarized harmonic plane waves having the same propagation constant

  1. Nov 15, 2014 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Hi! The entire problem is this:

    (a) Two plane-polarized harmonic plane waves having the same propagation constant are polarized, respectively, along two perpendicular directions. Show that if the phases of the two waves are different, their superposition yields generally an elliptically polarized plane wave.
    (b) Show that the time-average Poynting vector of an elliptically polarized plane wave is equal to the sum of the time-average, Poynting vectors of the two orthogonal plane-polarized waves into which it can be decomposed.

    2. Relevant equations
    Plane waves
    Def: a constant-frequency wave whose wavefronts (surfaces of constant phase) are infinite parallel planes of constant peak-to-peak amplitude normal to the phase velocity vector (Wikipedia).
    [itex]A(x,t)=A_ocos(kx-\omega t +\phi)[/itex]
    [itex]A(\mathbf{r},t)=A_o cos(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}-\omega t +\phi)[/itex]
    [itex]A(\mathbf{r},t)=A_o e^{i(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}-\omega t +\phi)}[/itex]

    [itex]A(x,t)[/itex] is the wave height at position x and t.
    [itex]A_o[/itex] is the amplitude
    [itex]k[/itex] is the wave number
    [itex]\phi[/itex] is the phase constant
    [itex]\omega[/itex] is the angular frequency

    Propagation constant:

    [itex]\frac{A_o}{A_x}=e^{\gamma x} [/itex]
    [itex]A_x[/itex] and [itex]A_o[/itex] are the amplitude at position x and the amplitude at source of propagation, respectively.
    [itex]\gamma[/itex] is the propagation constant
    [itex]\alpha[/itex] is the attenuation constant
    [itex]\beta[/itex] is the phase constant

    Equation of an ellipse:
    whose parametric equations are
    [itex]x=a ~ cos ~t[/itex]
    [itex]y=b ~sin ~t[/itex]

    3. The attempt at a solution

    So far these are the things that I am not sure:
    • I now know that plane waves have mathematical forms as given above. My question is how will they change if they become harmonic?
    • I assume that plane polarization means that if [itex]\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r},t)[/itex] is a vector, the disturbance is along a certain direction only. That is,[itex]\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r},t)=A_o e^{i(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}-\omega t +\phi)}\mathbf{\hat{x}}[/itex] is said to be plane polarized along the x direction. Right?
    • If the propagation constant is the same, I assume the phase constant is also the same which means that k is the same for both plane waves. Also by the definition of propagation constant above, the amplitude of the two plane waves are equal any time. Right?
    • I am utterly confused on which among these quantities are complex and which are real. Hence, I don't know how to manipulate the exponential parts or if I can apply Euler's formula to simplify these.
    My attempt for (a):
    Let the first plane wave be
    [itex]\mathbf{A_1}(\mathbf{r},t)=A_o e^{i(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}-\omega t +\phi)}\mathbf{\hat{x}}=A_o e^{i(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}-\omega t )}e^{\phi}\mathbf{\hat{x}}[/itex]
    and the second plane wave be
    [itex]\mathbf{A_2}(\mathbf{r},t)=A_o e^{i(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}-\omega t +\psi)}\mathbf{\hat{y}}=A_o e^{i(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}-\omega t )}e^{\psi}\mathbf{\hat{y}}[/itex]

    Taking their superposition:
    [itex]\mathbf{A}=A_o e^{i(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}-\omega t )}e^{\phi}\mathbf{\hat{x}}+A_o e^{i(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}-\omega t )}e^{\psi}\mathbf{\hat{y}}[/itex]
    [itex]\mathbf{A}=A_o e^{i(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}-\omega t )}(e^{\phi}\mathbf{\hat{x}}+e^{\psi}\mathbf{\hat{y}})[/itex]
    [itex]1=\frac{A_o}{\mathbf{A}}e^{i(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}-\omega t )}(e^{\phi}\mathbf{\hat{x}}+e^{\psi}\mathbf{\hat{y}})[/itex]

    I want to recast this to the form of equation of an ellipse (see relevant equations above) but I'm stuck.

    Thank you very much.
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 20, 2014 #2
    Thanks for the post! This is an automated courtesy bump. Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
  4. Nov 20, 2014 #3
    Thanks. No info yet. :( But I think the equation of ellipse above is wrong. I think I should put the equation of an oblique ellipse. That's all.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted