I Definition of a symmetry transformations in quantum mechanics

Lebnm
Messages
29
Reaction score
1
By the Wigner theorem, symmetries transformations are implemented by operators ##\hat{U}## that are unitary or antiunitary. This is what is written in most books. But I have read somewhere that, to ##\hat{U}## represent a symmetrie, it's necessary that ##\hat{U}^{\dagger} \hat{H} \hat{U} = \hat{H}##, that is, the hamiltonian has to be invariant under the transformation. Is it true? Are these definitions equivalents?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They are different. Wigner proved that the most general transformation that preserves the total probability has to be linear and unitary or anti-unitary. On the other hand, such ##U## is a symmetry of ##H## (i.e. of a system with Hamiltonian ##H##) if ##U^{\dagger}HU = H##.
 
  • Informative
Likes Lebnm
Or: not every transformation (described by U) is necessarily a symmetry transformation (described by [H,U]=0) ;)
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Or even different: being unitary is necessary but not sufficient to be a symmetry transformation.
 
Ok, thank you!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top