Undergrad Definition of a symmetry transformations in quantum mechanics

Click For Summary
Symmetry transformations in quantum mechanics are represented by unitary or antiunitary operators, as established by Wigner's theorem. For an operator ##\hat{U}## to qualify as a symmetry of a Hamiltonian ##\hat{H}##, it must satisfy the condition ##\hat{U}^{\dagger} \hat{H} \hat{U} = \hat{H}##, indicating that the Hamiltonian remains invariant under the transformation. While all symmetry transformations are linear and can be unitary or antiunitary, not every transformation represented by ##\hat{U}## is a symmetry transformation. The distinction lies in the requirement that being unitary is necessary but not sufficient for a transformation to be considered a symmetry. Understanding these nuances is crucial for interpreting quantum systems accurately.
Lebnm
Messages
29
Reaction score
1
By the Wigner theorem, symmetries transformations are implemented by operators ##\hat{U}## that are unitary or antiunitary. This is what is written in most books. But I have read somewhere that, to ##\hat{U}## represent a symmetrie, it's necessary that ##\hat{U}^{\dagger} \hat{H} \hat{U} = \hat{H}##, that is, the hamiltonian has to be invariant under the transformation. Is it true? Are these definitions equivalents?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They are different. Wigner proved that the most general transformation that preserves the total probability has to be linear and unitary or anti-unitary. On the other hand, such ##U## is a symmetry of ##H## (i.e. of a system with Hamiltonian ##H##) if ##U^{\dagger}HU = H##.
 
  • Informative
Likes Lebnm
Or: not every transformation (described by U) is necessarily a symmetry transformation (described by [H,U]=0) ;)
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Or even different: being unitary is necessary but not sufficient to be a symmetry transformation.
 
Ok, thank you!
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K