Curves are functions from an interval of the real numbers to a differentiable manifold.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Given a metric on the manifold, arc length is a property of the image of the curves, not of the curves itself. In other word, it is independent of the parametrization of the curve. In the case of the Euclidean space, arc length can be defined without using any parametrization of the curve, namely by the limit of the length of the approximating polygons. My question is whether could we give similar definition of the arc length in the case of manifolds? The standard definition is [tex]l(\gamma)=\int_{0}^{1} {|\dot\gamma(t)|} dt\ ,[/tex] and unlike in the case of the definition with polygons, this definition involves the parametrization of the curve, in spite that all parametrizations give the same result. How could we eliminate the unnecessary parametrization from the definition?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Definition of arc length on manifolds without parametrization

Loading...

Similar Threads - Definition length manifolds | Date |
---|---|

I Basic Q about Vector/tensor definition and velocity | Feb 24, 2018 |

I Definition of tangent space: why germs? | Oct 2, 2017 |

A Intution behind the definition of extrinsic curvature | Jun 15, 2017 |

A Definition of the Lie derivative | Oct 27, 2016 |

Topological Definition of Arc Length | Dec 21, 2009 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**