A Deformation in static and transient case

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating forces and deformation in a solenoid due to its magnetic field under static and transient conditions. In the static case, analytical calculations and FEM simulations yielded a maximum displacement of 35mm, while the transient simulation, with a current pulse of 2nsec, resulted in a significantly smaller displacement of 2mm. The user expresses a desire to understand why impulsive forces are less effective at causing deformation compared to sustained forces. They seek references to support the notion that continuous application of force leads to greater displacement than a brief, impulsive force. The conversation emphasizes the relationship between force duration and material deformation.
1Keenan
Messages
99
Reaction score
4
Hi all,

I have a doubt that I would like to solve with oyu help.
Basically I want to calculate forces on a solenoid due to the magnetic field it produces and than calculate deformation.

I consider 2 cases:
1/ Static
I did analytic calculation for force calculation, and i made FEM simulation in the static case to calculate also the displacement.
Force value is numerically in agreement with analytic result and I trust diplacement magnitude as I'm not expert in mechanical stress. result is 35mm as maximum displacement

2/ Transient
Current pulse in the solenoid is 2nsec at FWHM and tails exted for something like 5nsec, so I implement transiet simulation.
Force maximum value is the same as in the static case, but displacement is much smaller (2mm)

Now it make sense to me that such fast and impulsive stress is not very efficient, but mine is just a feeling and I would like to understand if it is correct or not and why.

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please start again and tell us clearly what you at doing and why .
 
more in general I want to understand if it is true or not that an impulsive force, something a Delta impulse in time, is not able to deform a body as if the same stress act for a long time.
 
Don't you think that applying a force continuously would give a larger displacement than applying a force and then almost immediately removing it?
 
Yes, this is what I think and why I said I have the feeling sounds logical, but I would like to have some reference I can read on this topic
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top