Delay and Sum Beamforming Equation Derivation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the derivation and simplification of beamforming equations, specifically transitioning from equation 1 to equations 2 and 3. The initial equation involves complex exponentials and requires the application of Euler's formula to convert to sine and cosine functions. Participants clarify the notation of M_(1/2) and its relationship to M, noting that M must equal 2*M_(1/2) + 1 for the derivation to hold. There is a suggestion to express the term 1 - e^(-ix) in a form that incorporates sine functions to facilitate the simplification. The conversation highlights the challenges in achieving the necessary cancellations to arrive at the desired equations.
mastrepolo
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have to simplify this beam form (equation 1) which simplifies to equation 2 and then finally to equation 3.

Homework Equations


equation 1: e^-ix((1-e^y)/(1-e^z)) where x = Beta*M_(1/2), y = beta*M, z= Beta

equation 2: sin(M*Beta/2)/(sin(Beta/2))

equation 3: M((sinc(M*Beta/2pi))/(sinc(Beta/2pi))) where sinc(x) = sin(pi*x)/pi*x

Eulors: e^jx = cos(x) +j*sin(x)

The Attempt at a Solution



I have tries to use eulors equation to change it to sine sand cosine but I can't seem to get the proper cancellations i am looking for.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mastrepolo said:
equation 1: e^-ix((1-e^y)/(1-e^z)) where x = Beta*M_(1/2), y = beta*M, z= Beta
What is M_(1/2)?
Do you mean ##e^{-i\frac{\beta}2(M-1)}\frac{1-e^{i\beta M}}{1-e^{i\beta}}##?
 
Sorry about the late response. It is M1/2 as a subscript, I attached a picture. I am going to the math department for some guidance since I can't seem to figure this one out. Any help would be appreciated,
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-10-29 at 9.15.20 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2018-10-29 at 9.15.20 PM.png
    2.3 KB · Views: 449
mastrepolo said:
It is M1/2 as a subscript,
So what is the relationship between that and M? To get your eqn 2 I need it to equal (M-1)/2.
 
haruspex said:
So what is the relationship between that and M? To get your eqn 2 I need it to equal (M-1)/2.

To get it in this form we had to assume M = 2*M1/2+1. so . There were some other step to get it into the equation form but this is where it originated from.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-10-29 at 10.45.29 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2018-10-29 at 10.45.29 PM.png
    1.4 KB · Views: 429
mastrepolo said:
To get it in this form
Are you saying to get eqn 1 you already assumed that?
I assume you know how to write sin x in terms of eix.
Can you see how to write 1-e-ix as some function f(x) multiplied by a sine function (not necessarily sin(x), exactly).
 
Back
Top