Vic Sandler
- 2
- 3
The problem is on pages 323 and 324 of the second edition.
Given the lagrangian
\mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}(x)F^{\mu\nu}(x) - \frac{1}{2\alpha}(\partial_{\mu}A^{\mu})^2
show that the momentum space photon propoagator is given by
D_F^{\mu\nu}(k) = \frac{-g^{\mu\nu} + \delta k^{\mu}k^{\nu}/k^2}{k^2 + i\epsilon}
\delta = 1 - \alpha^{-1}
I can solve this problem if I set
\delta = 1 - \alpha
but not with the delta stated in the book.
My question is this:
Should the book say \delta = 1 - \alpha and not \delta = 1 - \alpha^{-1}?
This question and this question only. The meat of the answer will be one word.
Homework Statement
Given the lagrangian
\mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}(x)F^{\mu\nu}(x) - \frac{1}{2\alpha}(\partial_{\mu}A^{\mu})^2
show that the momentum space photon propoagator is given by
D_F^{\mu\nu}(k) = \frac{-g^{\mu\nu} + \delta k^{\mu}k^{\nu}/k^2}{k^2 + i\epsilon}
Homework Equations
\delta = 1 - \alpha^{-1}
The Attempt at a Solution
I can solve this problem if I set
\delta = 1 - \alpha
but not with the delta stated in the book.
My question is this:
Should the book say \delta = 1 - \alpha and not \delta = 1 - \alpha^{-1}?
This question and this question only. The meat of the answer will be one word.