Delta-Y transformation of resistors

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the Delta-Y transformation of resistors and the derivation of the conductance transformation equation. A user attempts to derive the equation but encounters discrepancies in their calculations, specifically in transitioning from one equation to another. They initially present their equations for resistances and conductances but struggle with the algebra involved. Other participants point out the need for detailed work to identify errors, emphasizing that the issue lies in the algebraic manipulation. Ultimately, the user realizes their mistake and acknowledges the importance of careful algebra in the transformation process.
franktherabbit
Messages
12
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Starting from the expression of the Delta-Y resistor transformation work out the conductance transformation equation.

Homework Equations


3. The Attempt at a Solution [/B]
I will just be using one equation as others are done analogically. My Δ has ##(R_{12},R_{23},R_{13})## and my
γ has ##(R_1,R_2,R_3)##.
The first equation of transformation goes:
##R_1=\frac{R_{12}*R_{31}}{R_{12}+R_{23}+R_{13}}##
When i use that ##R=\frac{1}{G}## i get that
##G_1=\frac{G_{12}+G_{23}+G_{31}}{G_{23}}## which is not what they get. They get the same equation you get for Y-Delta transformation except for R u write G. ow did they get to that? I used a logical move and it can't get that way. What am i missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
franktherabbit said:
I used a logical move and it can't get that way. What am i missing?
Must be an algebra issue somewhere... but we can't tell you what's missing since it's almost all missing --- we can't check what we can't see :smile:

Can you show your work in detail?
 
Sure, :).
##R_1=\frac{R_{12}*R_{31}}{R_{12}+R_{23}+R_{31}}##
##G_1=\frac{1/G_{12}+1/G_{23}+1/G_{31}}{1/G_{12}*1/G_{31}}##
##G_1=\frac{(G_{12}+G_{23}+G_{31})/(G_{12}*G_{23}*G_{31})}{1/(G_{12}*G_{31})}##
##G_1=\frac{G_{12}+G_{23}+G_{31}}{G_{23}}##
See it? :)
 
I don't see how you went from your second line to your third. You haven't involved he denominator yet, so everything must be happening in the numerator. There you should end up with a sum of products divided by a product since all the terms are different.
 
  • Like
Likes franktherabbit
gneill said:
Must be an algebra issue somewhere... but we can't tell you what's missing since it's almost all missing --- we can't check what we can't see :smile:

Can you show your work in detail?

gneill said:
I don't see how you went from your second line to your third. You haven't involved he denominator yet, so everything must be happening in the numerator. There you should end up with a sum of products divided by a product since all the terms are different.
Ohhh, i see now, i had this all wrong. Turns out algebra is the killer here. Thanks man! :D
 
  • Like
Likes gneill

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
801
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top