Demystifying the Equation: Understanding the Meaning of Variables in dp/dt=F

  • Thread starter Thread starter mart
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
AI Thread Summary
The equation dp/dt=F represents the derivative of momentum (p) with respect to time (t), indicating the rate of change of momentum. The 'd' in this context signifies an infinitesimal change, distinguishing it from 'delta,' which typically represents a finite change. Understanding this distinction clarifies the relationship between momentum and force, as force is the rate of change of momentum over time. The discussion highlights that while 'd' and 'delta' are related, they serve different purposes in calculus. This clarification enhances comprehension of the equation's implications in physics.
mart
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I was watching a video and this guy comes up with a formula which I should know and it is not very strange to me, but there is this 'd' variable, which I believe we don't use in my country... perhaps we give it another name or so and I'm getting quite confused reading american/english materials anyways :
\frac{dp}{dt}=F

Could you kindly do a legend of this equation? I mean what the variables stand for.
Thanks for the support this is a great forum
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"d" isn't a variable in this case. dp/dt is the derivative of momentum with respect to time, i.e. the rate of change of momentum with respect to time, from calculus.
 
so isn't that equivalent to delta?
I got it if that is the case, it makes much more sense now :)
 
delta and "d" are very similar depending on how they are used...
often delta is a larger displacement than a tiny infinitesimal displacement "d".

see here alongside the first diagram:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivative

"change in y"/ " change in x" is delta y/delta x and the derivative is defined as the limit as delta approaches zero...
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top