Demystifying the Equation: Understanding the Meaning of Variables in dp/dt=F

  • Thread starter Thread starter mart
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
AI Thread Summary
The equation dp/dt=F represents the derivative of momentum (p) with respect to time (t), indicating the rate of change of momentum. The 'd' in this context signifies an infinitesimal change, distinguishing it from 'delta,' which typically represents a finite change. Understanding this distinction clarifies the relationship between momentum and force, as force is the rate of change of momentum over time. The discussion highlights that while 'd' and 'delta' are related, they serve different purposes in calculus. This clarification enhances comprehension of the equation's implications in physics.
mart
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I was watching a video and this guy comes up with a formula which I should know and it is not very strange to me, but there is this 'd' variable, which I believe we don't use in my country... perhaps we give it another name or so and I'm getting quite confused reading american/english materials anyways :
\frac{dp}{dt}=F

Could you kindly do a legend of this equation? I mean what the variables stand for.
Thanks for the support this is a great forum
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"d" isn't a variable in this case. dp/dt is the derivative of momentum with respect to time, i.e. the rate of change of momentum with respect to time, from calculus.
 
so isn't that equivalent to delta?
I got it if that is the case, it makes much more sense now :)
 
delta and "d" are very similar depending on how they are used...
often delta is a larger displacement than a tiny infinitesimal displacement "d".

see here alongside the first diagram:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivative

"change in y"/ " change in x" is delta y/delta x and the derivative is defined as the limit as delta approaches zero...
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top