Density equation of sound wave

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the density equation of a sound wave from the pressure equation given as ΔP = Po cos(ωt - kx). The user presents several equations, including the relationship between bulk modulus (B), pressure change (ΔP), and volume change (ΔV/V). The derivation leads to the expression for the change in density (∂ρ) in terms of the pressure and bulk modulus. The final equation presented is ∂ρ = (ρ Po/B) cos(ωt - kx), which seeks validation for its correctness. The conversation emphasizes the need for proof and proper explanation in the derivation process.
abhineetK
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Let pressure equation of sound wave be
\Deltap=Pocos(\omegat-kx), then
what will be the density equation of the sound wave?
give your answer with proof and proper explanation...(Derive the equation)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi abhineetK! :wink:

Show us what you've tried, and where you're stuck, and then we'll know how to help! :smile:
 
\deltaP=Pocos(\omegat-kx) ...(1)

B=-\deltaP/(\DeltaV/V) ...(2)

\rho=m/V

=>\partial\rho=-(m/V2)\partialV

=>\partial\rho=-\rho(\partialV/V)

=>\partial\rho/\rho=-\partialV/V

=>\partial\rho/\rho=\deltaP/B [using (2)]

=>\partial\rho=(\rho.Po/B)cos(\omegat-kx) [using (1)]
Is it correct?
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Does two-slit sound-wave interference pattern return to original form?
Replies
10
Views
2K
I A Question About Shock Waves From an Airplane
2
Replies
82
Views
7K
Solving a Sound Wave Equation in Physics 1: Halliday, Resnick, and Krane
Replies
9
Views
2K
I Sound pressure and inverse distance law
Replies
5
Views
2K
B What sound frequencies can pass through a hole in a wall?
Replies
31
Views
3K
Maths for Sound passing through different mediums
Replies
10
Views
2K
Sound wave intensity (dB) and sound processing
Replies
3
Views
2K
Huygens' Principle for Sound Waves
Replies
9
Views
9K
Confusion about the derivation of the speed of sound
Replies
8
Views
3K
Equation of a sound wave with viscous damping in ideal gas
Replies
3
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top