Density matrix for QFT from the path integral?

wandering.the.cosmos
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
(1) How does one obtain the density matrix formalism for quantum fields from the path integral?

(2) Suppose I have a box containing interacting particles of different kinds. Is it possible to incorporate into the density matrix formalism both a non-zero temperature T as well as a time t dependence on the distribution f(T,t,p) of the various particles? (I've seen treatments on finite temperature field theory, where imaginary time is identified with inverse temperature, but I'm wondering how we can include both T and t.)

Thanks for any input.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wandering.the.cosmos[QUOTE said:
](1) How does one obtain the density matrix formalism for quantum fields from the path integral?

(2) Suppose I have a box containing interacting particles of different kinds. Is it possible to incorporate into the density matrix formalism both a non-zero temperature T as well as a time t dependence on the distribution f(T,t,p) of the various particles? (I've seen treatments on finite temperature field theory, where imaginary time is identified with inverse temperature, but I'm wondering how we can include both T and t.)

If you are talking in the contex of Thermo Field Dynamics (TFD), then you should look at (Matsumoto et al.);

Phys Rev (1983),D28,1931.
Phys. Lett (1984),140B,53.
Phys Rev (1984),D29,2838.
Phys Rev (1984),D29,1116.
######(1985),D31,1495.
#############,429.

You will find the answer to your 2nd question in anyone of the above references, which is Yes you can, but it turned out that the two formalsims are identical.

As for your 1st question, I suppose, you could always use the relation

<T{\phi(x_{1})...\phi(x_{n})}> = Tr[T{\phi(x_{1})...}\rho]



regards

sam
 
wandering.the.cosmos, I would very much like to know how long you have had this idea for? I may be workin on a very similar thing. There has not been to much work on these things
 
Epicurus said:
wandering.the.cosmos, I would very much like to know how long you have had this idea for? I may be workin on a very similar thing. There has not been to much work on these things

I've had in my mind questions about such issues for perhaps 1-2 years, but have never really sat down to seriously work things out or see what has been done. One particular paper that I came across regarding these is

E. Calzetta and B.L. Hu
Nonequilibrium quantum fields: Closed-time-path effective action, Wigner function, and Boltzmann equation
Phys. Rev. D 37, 2878–2900 (1988)

But I am rather far from understanding it properly. They seemed to have obtained quantum Boltzmann kinetic equations from the path integral, including the BBGKY hierachy. My understanding is that the density matrix formalism ought to yield Boltzmann equations as a special case, so perhaps the above is what one needs to investigate such issues.

What have you been working on, Epicurus?
 
Last edited:
The path integral formulation of the thermal density matrix is able to give us the partition function for Boltzmann, Bosonic and fermionic systems. In this representation, particles are given as closed loops through a correspodance with imaginary time and inverse temperature. I have interested in time correlation functions in these systems.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top