Density matrix off-diagonal elements

auctor
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
The possible values of the diagonal elements of a density matrix are restricted by the condition \mathrm{Tr}~\rho = 1. Are there any restrictions on the possible values of off-diagonal elements, apart from the obvious \mathrm{Re}~\rho_{nm} = \mathrm{Re}~\rho_{mn}, \mathrm{Im}~\rho_{nm} = - \mathrm{Im}~\rho_{mn}? If the off-diagonals are written in the form \left| \rho_{nm} \right| \exp{i \phi_{nm}}, do the absolute value and the phase have a simple physical meaning?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
auctor said:
The possible values of the diagonal elements of a density matrix are restricted by the condition \mathrm{Tr}~\rho = 1. Are there any restrictions on the possible values of off-diagonal elements, apart from the obvious \mathrm{Re}~\rho_{nm} = \mathrm{Re}~\rho_{mn}, \mathrm{Im}~\rho_{nm} = - \mathrm{Im}~\rho_{mn}? If the off-diagonals are written in the form \left| \rho_{nm} \right| \exp{i \phi_{nm}}, do the absolute value and the phase have a simple physical meaning?


The magnitude of a coherence between two levels is bounded by the population in those levels:
|\rho_{nm}|^2 \le \rho_{nn}\rho_{mm}\le 1.

The phase differences determine the time dependent properties of the total system. These phases can be set by time and frequency shaped laser pulses in order to enhance or suppress properties of the system. This is the field of "optical quantum control". Take a look at, for example, Ben Fain's book "Irreveribilities in Quantum Mechanics" or better yet, David Tannor's EXCELLENT "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics: A Time-Dependent Perspective". There's also a review called "Optical control of molecular dynamics" edited by Stuart Rice. It's not that great of a source to learn from, but it's a nice collection of the ideas. Most of it will discuss the interference in the wave function formalism, but you'll get the basic picture.
 
For a system with time Independent hamiltonian , in the basis of energy eigen kets, every off diagonal element between two kets corresponding to two distinct energy eigen values will oscillate with Bohr Frequency.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top