Density of States (Condensed Matter)

roam
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



I need some help with the following problem:



Homework Equations



##\rho(k) dk = \frac{L}{\pi} dk##

##L=Na##

##\omega^2= \omega_m^2 \ sin^2 (qa/2)##

The Attempt at a Solution



The density of states is given by:

##g(\omega)= \rho (k) / \frac{dw}{dk}##​

Where

##\frac{d\omega}{dk} = \frac{a}{2} \ cos \frac{qa}{2}##

##g(\omega) = \frac{L}{\pi} \frac{2}{a} \frac{1}{\omega_m \ cos (qa/2)}##

Using the identity

##sin^2 x + cos^2 x =1 \implies cos x = \sqrt{1-sin^2 x} , \ cos(qa/2)=\sqrt{1-sin^2(qa/2)}##

We get

##g(\omega)=\frac{L}{\pi} \frac{2}{a \omega_m \sqrt{1-sin^2(qa/2)}} = \frac{2Na}{a \pi \omega_m \sqrt{1-sin^2(qa/2)}}##

##\therefore g(\omega)= \frac{N}{\pi} \frac{2}{\sqrt{\omega_m^2 -\omega^2}}##​

But this is not the correct answer. Why is there a "2" on the numerator, and how can we get rid of this factor of 2? :confused:

Did I make a mistake, or is this a typo in the question?

Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe your derivation is correct. The factor of 2 should be there as you have shown. See equation (35) here.

Keeping track of factors of 2 can get confusing when comparing periodic boundary conditions and fixed boundary conditions. But the density of states should end up the same for either boundary condition.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top