How Do You Convert a Density Operator to Matrix Form?

PatsyTy
Messages
30
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Write the density operator

$$\rho=\frac{1}{3}|u><u|+\frac{2}{3}|v><v|+\frac{\sqrt{2}}{3}(|u><v|+|v><u|, \quad where <u|v>=0$$

In matrix form

Homework Equations



$$\rho=\sum_i p_i |\psi><\psi|$$

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
The two first factors ##\frac{1}{3}|u><u|## and ##\frac{2}{3}|v><v|## pertain to the diagonal elements of the 2x2 matrix, I am unsure how to find the off diagonal elements for this matrix and the ##|u><v|## and ##|v><u|## I don't think are included in the sum I listed in the relevant equations.

In matrix form I have

$$\rho=
\left( \begin{array}{cc}
1 & ? \\
? & 2 \end{array} \right)$$

I have the suspicion that $$\frac{\sqrt{2}}{3}$$ is the offdiagonal elements, however, I don't want to put this down just off of my suspicion. Any tips, or things to think of for me would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is nothing deep to be appreciated here. Its just that u and v are somehow serving as the matrix indices. So uu and vv are the diagonal elements and uv and vu are the off-diagonal elements.
 
ShayanJ said:
There is nothing deep to be appreciated here. Its just that u and v are somehow serving as the matrix indices. So uu and vv are the diagonal elements and uv and vu are the off-diagonal elements.

Thank you, that is what I suspected. How do these cross terms arise from the equation

$$\rho=\sum_i p_i|\psi_i><\psi_i$$

It seems that these cross terms do not come from this summation as it is over only one index.
 
The states in that formula are not the base states. That definition is for when you want to assign classical probabilities for the system to be in different states that are not necessarily orthogonal. The off-diagonal terms arise when you expand those states in terms of orthonormal base states.
 
  • Like
Likes PatsyTy
ShayanJ said:
The states in that formula are not the base states. That definition is for when you want to assign classical probabilities for the system to be in different states that are not necessarily orthogonal. The off-diagonal terms arise when you expand those states in terms of orthonormal base states.

Thank you, that makes sense!
 
##|\Psi|^2=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\exp(\frac{-(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##\braket{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx\,x\exp(-\frac{(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##y=x-x_0 \quad x=y+x_0 \quad dy=dx.## The boundaries remain infinite, I believe. ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dy(y+x_0)\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2}).## ##\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,y\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2})+\frac{2x_0}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,\exp(-\frac{y^2}{b^2}).## I then resolved the two...
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top