Density & Speed in Relation to Power

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between density, volume, and power in fluid dynamics, specifically in calculating the power of water flow using the equation P=0.5ρAv^3. It clarifies that volume is represented as volumetric flow per second, making the equation dimensionally correct. The derivation shows that the work done by a fluid in motion relates to kinetic energy, which incorporates both density and velocity. Additionally, it emphasizes that power is directly linked to force and velocity, reinforcing the connection between power, density, and fluid motion. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurate calculations in fluid dynamics.
MrPotatoHead
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Just out of curiosity, why is the density and volume used to find the power of a flow of water for example. I know the equation for this is P=0.5ρAv^3 where ρ=density and v=speed of the water cubed.

Any suggestions?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MrPotatoHead said:
Hi,

Just out of curiosity, why is the density and volume used to find the power of a flow of water for example. I know the equation for this is P=0.5ρAv^3 where ρ=density and v=speed of the water cubed.

Any suggestions?

Thank you

You've put Volume as area times velocity. Instead of volume , you've put volumetric flow of fluid per second. Your equation is dimensionally correct.

Work done by fluid in motion = Kinetic energy = mv2/2
Putting m = ρV
we have
Work done by fluid in motion = ρVv2/2
Now putting V= Ah where h is height
Work done = ρAhv2/2/2
Dividing by time , we have
Power of flow of fluid = ρAv3/2

Through this derivation I think its clear why density and velocity of fluid are related with power.

Also Power is force times velocity. So power depends on velocity of fluid. Work done here is the kinetic energy possessed by the fluid which of course depends on mass and hence depends on density of fluid. So Since power depends on work , so here in this case , power has to depend on density as well.
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K