Derivation of spring constant k: Where can I find it?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding a reference for the mathematical derivation of the spring constant formula k = G*d^4/(8*n*D^3) for coiled springs. Despite a Google search yielding no results, participants note that this derivation is a fundamental concept in linear elasticity theory. A suggestion is made to consult A. C. Ugural's "Mechanical Design: An Integrated Approach" for relevant information. Additionally, the derivation of the spring constant is linked to the deflection of a coiled spring, which can be derived using Castigliano's theorem. The quest for a definitive source continues, highlighting the challenge in locating academic references on this topic.
redoubt
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Folks---

I want a reference(text or journal article) that presents the mathematical
derivation of the following formula for the spring constant k of a coiled,
ideal spring.

k = G*d^4/(8*n*D^3)

A Google search was unsuccessful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Spring Constant Derivation: Where can I find it?

Folks---

I want a reference(textbook or journal article) that presents the mathematical derivation of the following formula for the spring constant k of a coiled, ideal spring.

k=G*d^4/(8*n*D^3)

A Google search was unsuccessful.

When this question was asked in the General Physics Forum several weeks ago, there were 81 views, but no replies. I believe this derivation is a classic in linear elasticity theory, but I can't locate it.
 
If this is not a homework type question, you might try Eng-Tips to see if anyone on there knows.
 
Where did you find the formula?

I found this:
http://www.sussex.ac.uk/engineering/documents/sm_lecture_19.pdf

but no obvious derivations...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
redoubt said:
Folks---

I want a reference(textbook or journal article) that presents the mathematical derivation of the following formula for the spring constant k of a coiled, ideal spring.

k=G*d^4/(8*n*D^3)

A Google search was unsuccessful.

When this question was asked in the General Physics Forum several weeks ago, there were 81 views, but no replies. I believe this derivation is a classic in linear elasticity theory, but I can't locate it.

This constant comes from the derivation of the deflection of a coiled spring. By deriving the deflection, one can extract the spring constant k from the equation.

The derivation of the equation for the deflection of a spring comes from Castigliano's theorem.

See A. C. Ugural "Mechanical Design: An Integrated Approach" McGraw-Hill Professional (2003): pg. 565
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top