Derivation of the average translational kinetic energy of a molecule

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the derivation of the average translational kinetic energy of a molecule, specifically questioning the addition of velocity components. The user is confused about the textbook's assertion that the average of the squared velocities in three dimensions can be simplified to three times the average of one component's squared velocity. Clarification is provided that while the square of the magnitude of the velocity vector is indeed the sum of the squares of its components, when averaging, the equality of the averages allows for simplification. The key point is that the average squared velocity can be expressed in terms of one component due to their equal contributions in a three-dimensional isotropic system. Understanding this concept resolves the confusion regarding the addition of vector components in the context of kinetic energy.
NeuronalMan
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hello, this is not actually a homework problem. I just can't seem to understand the derivation of the average translational kinetic energy of a molecule. I am startled by the way the velocities are added.


Homework Equations




My undergraduate level textbook says that (vx^2)av = (vy^2)av = (vz^2)av, but then it says (v^2)av = (vx^2)av + (vy^2)av + (vz^2)av = 3(vx^2)av

How can velocities being vectors be added this way? I am surely missing something here.


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
I thinking you are missing the importance of subscripts. It is certainly true that the square of the magnitude of the 3-d velocity vector is always

v2=vx2+vy2+vz2

what does this become when you replace the components with their averages which are all equal to each other?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top