Derivation of the speed of sound waves equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the derivation of the speed of sound waves through a medium, starting with the impulse-momentum relationship and incorporating the bulk modulus. The user expresses confusion about the cancellation of time (Δt) in the equations, questioning whether it implies that the speed of gas particles and sound waves are the same. Clarification is sought on the relationship between the velocities of gas particles and sound propagation. The conversation confirms that the derivation pertains to Newton's formula for the speed of sound in gases. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities involved in understanding the mathematical relationships in sound wave propagation.
FerPhys
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I'm learning about the speed of sound waves through a medium. The derivation is initiated through Impulse=change in linear momentum (I=Δp), then I=ΣFΔt=(Area×Δpressure×Δt) in the x direction
The derivation proceeds by replacing the Δpressure with another equation we had derived earlier
ΔP=-B(ΔV/Vi) where B is the bulk modulus. The initial volume (Vi) is vAΔt where v is the velocity of sound multiplied by the time it takes to reach the end of the container (gives you a length which you can multiply to get Area to get the volume of the gas without anything force acting on it).
This is where I get a bit confused. My textbook says ΔV= (-vxAΔt) where vx = the speed of the elements in the medium or in this case a gas. When you plug everything back in into -B(ΔV/Vi) you get ΔP=B(vx / v) . My question now is, why did the Δt cancel out? Wouldn't that be like saying that the time it took for those gas particles to move through the entire container was the same as the time it took for sound to move through the entire container? Also, if that were the case wouldn't they be going at the same speed and therefore the vx/v should also cancel?

This my first post on this website so if I can do anything to make my posts more clear please let me know!
Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you deriving the Newton's formula for speed of sound in say air/gas?
 
Can you show an image of the page where they do this?
 
This may come off as completely rude but I understand the derivation now.. sorry :(
yes its for Newtons formula for speed in sound..
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top