Derivative Terms of Effective Action

TriTertButoxy
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
I know that the effective action can be written as a double expansion in derivatives and loop (h-bar). For example, take the effective action for a real scalar field:

\Gamma[\phi]=\int d^4x\left[V_\text{eff}(\phi)+\frac{1}{2}Z(\phi)\partial_\mu\phi\partial^\mu\phi+\mathcal{O}(\partial^4)+\ldots\right]
=\int d^4x\left[V^{(0)}(\phi)+\hbar V^{(1)}(\phi)+\ldots+\frac{1}{2}(1+\hbar Z^{(1)}(\phi)+\ldots)\partial_\mu\phi\partial^\mu\phi+\mathcal{O}(\partial^4)+\ldots\right]

I am familiar with the techniques of getting the terms with zero derivatives (effective potential) to the desired order in the loop expansion (path integral method, tadpole method, etc...) -- this is fairly standard.

But, are there techniques of reliably getting closed-form expressions for the Z-functions in front of derivative terms? (preferably using path integrals)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By effective action do you mean the quantum action, i.e., an action whose tree diagrams give the loop diagrams of the real action? Or is this the Wilson effective action?

Generically would you would take your theory, calculate the propagator and n-point vertices to some order using the Feynman rules, plug it into this action:

\Gamma(\phi)= \frac{1}{2} \int \frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4}\phi(-k)(k^2+m^2-\Pi(k^2))\phi(k)+\Sigma_n \frac{1}{n!}\int \frac{d^4k_1}{(2\pi)^4}...\frac{d^4k_n}{(2\pi)^4} (2\pi)^4 \delta(k_1+...+k_n)V_n(k_1,...,k_n)\phi(k_1)...\phi(k_n)}

and then inverse Fourier-transform everything, and collect the terms into the form of the effective action you have above?
 
Last edited:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top