Derivatives: The Method of Increments

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter camdenreslink
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Method of Increments for finding derivatives, specifically using the function s = 10t² at t = 3. The user demonstrates the calculation process, showing that Δs/Δt simplifies to 60 + 10Δt, leading to a limit of 60 as Δt approaches 0. The user expresses frustration with the notation used in the book "Calculus: An Intuitive and Physical Approach" by Morris Kline, particularly the use of s₃ instead of s(3), and notes a lack of clarity in the steps presented. The discussion emphasizes the connection between the Method of Increments and the traditional limit definition of derivatives.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic calculus concepts, including limits and derivatives.
  • Familiarity with the function notation and algebraic manipulation.
  • Knowledge of the traditional derivative definition: lim_{h → 0} (f(a + h) - f(a))/h.
  • Experience with polynomial functions and their properties.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the differences between the Method of Increments and traditional derivative definitions.
  • Explore additional resources on calculus notation and its implications for understanding derivatives.
  • Practice derivative calculations using various functions to reinforce understanding.
  • Review advanced calculus texts for deeper insights into derivative concepts and methods.
USEFUL FOR

Students revisiting calculus concepts, educators seeking to clarify derivative methods, and anyone interested in the nuances of mathematical notation and its impact on understanding calculus.

camdenreslink
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I am using this book: https://www.amazon.com/dp/0486404536/?tag=pfamazon01-20
Calculus: An Intuitive and Physical Approach by: Kline

I've already finished Calc I and II, but I'm brushing up on my skills because I don't feel entirely confident about them.

This is what the method says to do to find a derivative:

[tex]s = 10t^2[/tex] given [tex]t=3[/tex]

[tex]s_{3} + \Delta s = 10(3 + \Delta t)^2[/tex]

[tex]s_{3} + \Delta s = 90 + 60\Delta t + 10\Delta t^2[/tex]
[tex]- (s_{3} = 90)[/tex]


[tex]\frac{\Delta s}{\Delta t} = \frac{60 \Delta t + 10 \Delta t^2}{\Delta t}[/tex]

[tex]\displaystyle{\frac{\Delta s}{\Delta t}} = 60 + 10 \Delta t[/tex]

[tex]lim_{\Delta t \rightarrow 0} \displaystyle{\frac{\Delta s}{\Delta t}} = 60[/tex]

I understand the method and have finished all of the practice problems in the book, but I'm having trouble linking this with the way I was taught to derive in my calculus class with

[tex]lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \frac{f(a + h) - f(a)}{h}[/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I really hate his abuse of notation, using s3 for s(3). There seem to be a lot of steps missing, which might make it difficult to follow his logic.

For example, [itex]\Delta s[/itex] = s(3 + [itex]\Delta t[/itex]) - s(3) = 10(3 + [itex]\Delta t[/itex])2 - 90
= 90 + 60 [itex]\Delta t[/itex] + 10 ( [itex]\Delta t[/itex])2 - 90
= 60 [itex]\Delta t[/itex] + 10 ( [itex]\Delta t[/itex])2

Dividing by delta t gives you this, the same as above:
[tex]\frac{\Delta s}{\Delta t}} = 60 + 10 \Delta t[/tex]

Finally, take the limit to get ds/dt.

Delta t in his exposition is the same as h in what you're used to. Hopefully, my explanation will help you understand the parallels between the two approaches.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K