Derive Wheatstone Bridge's equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter omelet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derive
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the Wheatstone Bridge equation, with a participant attempting to simplify the derivation by neglecting small changes in resistance. They express their approach mathematically but struggle to achieve the desired form of the equation. A request for clarification on symbols and definitions is made, emphasizing the need for clear communication of variables involved in the derivation. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding how small changes in resistors affect the bridge's balance. Overall, the thread seeks guidance on the derivation process and clarification of terms used.
omelet
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



how to derive this equation?
WheatstoneBridge01EqF.gif


and

WheatstoneBridge01EqF2.gif


Homework Equations



WheatstoneBridge01EqE.gif


WheatstoneBridge01EqD.gif


The Attempt at a Solution



I try derive it that to cut out high degree part such as delta_R1*delta_R2
because my teacher told that is very small and near to zero. but I can't made it to that given form. And i think Resistance that have change must be equal like as fraction R1*R3=R2*R4 so (R1+delta_R1)(R2+delta_R2)=(R3+delta_R3)(R4+delta_R4)

Now, I made the last expression to

delta_Vo = [deltaR1/R1-deltaR2/R2+deltaR3/R3-deltaR4/R4]/[2*(1+deltaR3/R3+deltaR4/R4)*(1+(deltaR1+R1)/(deltaR2+R2))]Vs


this is my first time for this forum and my english is not good. so if i do something wrong or someone can't understand me I'm very apologize.

I'd appreciate if someone can help me or tell me if i do wrong way.

Thanks alot
 

Attachments

  • WheatstoneBridge01EqF.gif
    WheatstoneBridge01EqF.gif
    931 bytes · Views: 456
Physics news on Phys.org
We need a statement of the problem, namely what are you looking for? What do the symbols that you use stand for? I can understand R1, but what is ΔR1? What about Vg and ΔVg? Are you trying to find how the bridge becomes unbalanced when you change the four resistors by small amounts? You should be providing the details and definitions and we should not be guessing what they are.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top