Deriving Energy and Wave Functions from 3D Schrödinger

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the energy levels and wave functions for a three-dimensional quantum harmonic oscillator (QHO) with quantum numbers nx, ny, nz and frequency ω0. The user expresses confusion over the order of solving the problem parts, suggesting they should derive the wave function before the energy levels. They attempt to formulate the wave function but struggle to incorporate the quantum numbers into their expression. The potential energy is correctly identified, but the user is uncertain about how to relate the wave function to the ground state without the n values. The conversation highlights the complexities of deriving solutions in quantum mechanics, particularly for multi-dimensional systems.
erok81
Messages
454
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have a quantum harmonic oscillator with quantum numbers nx,ny,nz ≥ 0 and frequency ω0. There are three parts to the problem. To me it seems they are out of order, but I'm kind of shaky deriving these.

a) Write down the energy level Enx,ny,nz of a QHO in 3d with quantum numbers nx,ny,nz ≥ 0 and frequency ω0?

b) Write down the normalized wave function for the ground state ψ0(x,y,z)?

c) What is the Schrödinger equation for the generic 3d wave function ψnx,ny,nz(x,y,z)?

Homework Equations



n/a

The Attempt at a Solution



To me I think one would solve this c, b, a. I can state a and b first by copying out of the book, but I'd rather derive them since that's the correct method. The only thing I cannot figure out what my wave function is to involve the energy levels.

My guess for the wave equation is...

\psi (x,y,z) = Ae^{\frac{1}{2}(x^2 +y^2 +z^2)}

But I am missing my energy levels n. So I know that is wrong.

My 3d Schrödinger equation equation in this case is...

Well first the potential is given by...

U(\vec{r}) = \frac{1}{2}m \omega^{2}\vec{r}^2~=~\frac{1}{2}m \omega^{2}(x^2+y^2+z^2)

Back to my Schrödinger...

\frac{- \hbar ^2}{2m} \nabla ^2 \psi (\vec{r}) +U(\vec{r}) \psi (\vec{r}) = E \psi (\vec{r})

So. Where I am confused is guessing my wave equation and then solving for the energy.

I thought I would have to do the order like I posted above, but the question is worded differently. Maybe I am more confused then I thought. :)

The steps I would do is write out my Schrödinger, use separation of variables, solve for my wave equation, then find the energy. But I'm not fully sure since I won't have my n values.

Hopefully this makes sense. I've been up for a while and am having some trouble explaining what I've done so far. :smile:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
So my wave equation isn't correct.

I believe it should be

<br /> \psi (x,y,z) = Ae^{\frac{\alpha}{2}(x^2 +y^2 +z^2)}<br />

Where α = mω/ℏ

However the problem states to write down the normalized wave function for the ground state! I don't have any n terms in my wave equation and therefore have no way to relate it to the ground state.

If this were a box, I'd have sin terms and n terms, and I'd be set. However I see no way to incorporate n into this type of wave function.

Any ideas?

On a side note: should I have put this in advanced physics?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top