Deriving Helmholtz Thermodynamic Potential & Corresponding Maxwell Relation

Hart
Messages
168
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



To state the differential form of the Helmholtz thermodynamic potential and
derive the corresponding Maxwell's relation.

Homework Equations



Stated within the solution attempt.

The Attempt at a Solution



  • Helmholtz function: F = U - TS


  • Calculating the differential form:

    For infinitesimal change: dF = dU - tdS - SdT

    Then using: TdS = dU + PdV ,

    Therefore:

    dF = -PdV - SdT


  • Which then follows that can write: F = F(V,T)

    Hence:

    dF = \left(\frac{\partial F}{\partial V}\right)_{T}dV + \left(\frac{\partial F}{\partial T}\right)_{V}dT


  • Comparing coefficients in the previous two stated expressions for dF:

    P = -\left(\frac{\partial F}{\partial V}\right)_{T}

    and

    S = -\left(\frac{\partial F}{\partial T}\right)_{V}


  • Then as F is a function of state, then dF is an exact differential and
    the condition for an exact differential gives:


    \left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial T}\right)_{v} = \left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial V}\right)_{T}

    Which is the Maxwell relation, derived as required.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good to me.
 
Brill.. :biggrin: .. just wanted to check it through with someone else!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top