Deriving Linear Transformations - Special Relativity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving linear transformations in the context of special relativity, focusing on the relationship between stationary and moving observers. The final transformation equations are presented, including the Lorentz transformations for space and time. The user expresses a desire to understand the derivation process rather than just the final results, indicating a need for clarity on the method involved. They initially struggle with the concept but eventually report a breakthrough in their understanding. The conversation also touches on the educational context, questioning which classes typically cover linear transformations.
erok81
Messages
454
Reaction score
0
I wasn't sure if this counted as intro physics. Feel free to move if I have it in the wrong place.

Homework Statement



In class we learned some linear transformations where we have a stationary observer and another moving near the speed of light.

Describing the reference frames:
s' -> x'=u't'
s-> x=ut

Boundary conditions:
x=x'=t=t'=0

Therefore at the origin of x we have x=ut=0, x'=u't', x=-vt'

Using these for the transformations:
x'=Ax+Bt
t'=Cx+Dt

Homework Equations



Final transforms:

x'=\gamma(x-vt)

t'=\gamma(\frac{-vx}{c^2}+t)

x=\gamma(x'+vt')

t=\gamma(\frac{vx'}{c^2}+t')

The Attempt at a Solution



So I can solve these as long as I have my notes that I can follow so I know what to solve for and when. My professor ended up solving for the A,B,C,D first then subbing in gamma etc to arrive at the final results.

My questions is: I'd love to be able to derive these on my own. My problem I don't know what I am trying to solve for or the point of what I am solving for. Point may not be the best word - I understand the end result and know how it is used, I just don't understand the steps/method to get there. (the algebra I get, not the method.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would any more information help? I'm not sure if what I am saying makes total sense. :)
 
Ok...I finally figured this out and can do it.

So how about this question instead.

I don't think I've really done linear transformations. What class are these usually taught in?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top