Deriving Rocket's position from acceleration.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating a missile's displacement based on its acceleration equations, specifically a_x = 0.8 and a_y = -6.0 - 3.0t. Initially, the user integrated the acceleration to derive equations for x(t) and y(t), but their calculations yielded an incorrect displacement. Upon realizing the need to convert velocity from km/h to m/s, they still obtained a result that did not match the expected answer. Participants noted that the low value of a_x compared to a_y seemed suspicious, suggesting a possible typographical error in the problem statement. The conversation concludes with the acknowledgment that the acceleration values might have been incorrectly entered in the online exercise.
ShizukaSm
Messages
85
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There's a short introduction saying that honing missiles can determine their position by utilizing their acceleration, then the problem says: Suppose that the missile's acceleration obeys the following equations:
<br /> \\<br /> a_x = 0.8\\<br /> a_y = -6.0 - 3.0t<br />
Knowing that, in t = 0, v_x = 600 km/h and v_y = 0, calculate the missile's displacement in ten seconds. (Answer is 2.2km)

Homework Equations



Just the equations already provided.

The Attempt at a Solution


Alright, so, what I tried to do was integrating the acceleration two consecutive times to arrive at an equation for x(t) and y(t), which gave me:
<br /> \\<br /> x(t) = 0.4 t^2 + 600t + x_o\\<br /> y(t) = \frac{-1}{2}t^3 - 3t^2 + y_0<br />

Then I attempted to get the displacement of both axes(Using time = 1/360h, since I have to convert 10 seconds to hours):
<br /> \\<br /> x(10)-x(0) = 1.67km\\<br /> y(10)-y(0) = -2.3*10^{-5} km<br />
And then, by calculatingsqrt(x^2 + y^2)I obviously get pretty much 1.67km, which is wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ShizukaSm said:
<br /> \\<br /> a_x = 0.8\\<br /> a_y = -6.0 - 3.0t<br />
What are the units of distance and time in those equations?
 
haruspex said:
What are the units of distance and time in those equations?

That's a great question. I just realized it says in parenthesis (SI Units), so m/s. In other words, I shouldn't convert time to seconds, I should convert km/h to m/s. However, by converting 600 km/h to 166.67 m/s and doing the necessary calculations I still obtain only 1884.26 m(With x =1706 and y = -800) : S
 
ax = 0.8 looks suspicious. Why so much less than ay? If you make it 8.0 you get the book answer.
 
haruspex said:
ax = 0.8 looks suspicious. Why so much less than ay? If you make it 8.0 you get the book answer.

Wow, you're absolutely right! Wonderful! Thanks.

It definitely says 0.8 and It's actually an online list of exercises, not a textbook, so I find very possible that the person that typed it made a mistake.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top