Deriving Second Order Circuit Equation Using Natural Response

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the second order differential equation for a circuit's natural response. Participants explore various methods of analysis, including nodal and mesh analysis, and engage in deriving equations related to circuit behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant attempts to derive the second order equation using nodal analysis but struggles to express all variables in terms of either v1 or v2.
  • Another participant suggests labeling circuit components and summing currents at v1 and v2 to avoid confusion, emphasizing the importance of dimensional checking in equations.
  • A third participant provides a detailed derivation of the natural response, leading to a characteristic equation and proposing a solution for v2(t) based on the roots of the characteristic equation.
  • A later reply introduces a Laplace transform method to find the transfer function of the circuit, presenting an alternative approach to derive the relationship between V1 and V2.
  • One participant expresses confidence in their approach and offers to verify calculations, while another indicates their work was primarily for personal understanding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple approaches to the problem, including nodal analysis, mesh analysis, and Laplace transforms, indicating that there is no consensus on a single method or solution. Disagreements and uncertainties about the derivation process and the correctness of equations persist throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants' equations contain mixed units, and there are unresolved mathematical steps in the derivations. The discussion reflects varying levels of familiarity with circuit analysis techniques and assumptions about initial conditions.

p75213
Messages
93
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Refer Attachment.
I am trying to derive the second order equation using the natural response of the circuit


Homework Equations


Refer Attachment


The Attempt at a Solution


Nodal Analysis:
v1+\frac{1}{2}\frac{dv1}{dt}+\frac{1}{3}\frac{dv2}{dt}=0
Mesh Analysis LHS:
i+v1=0

I can't see how to get everything in terms of v1 or v2
 

Attachments

  • ScreenHunter_01 Nov. 23 20.26.gif
    ScreenHunter_01 Nov. 23 20.26.gif
    10.1 KB · Views: 560
Physics news on Phys.org
First I would label the components from left to right: R1, R2, C1, C2.

Then I would write equations summing currents at v1 and v2.

Then solve the diff. eq's (zero initial conditions), which gets you v1 and v2. Then your answer is v1 - v2.

The reason you should label the components is otherwise you get all mixed up as to which resistor is which, for example. And you wind up with equations like your
i + v1 = 0 which seemingly mixes volts and amps in terms within the same equation, making dimensional checking impossible. The greatest tool for error checking of equations is dimensional checking!
 
Thanks for getting the ball rolling rude man. The most challenging part is coming up with the differential equation.

\begin{array}{l}<br /> {\rm{Find natural response:}} \\ <br /> \frac{{{v_1}}}{1} + \frac{1}{2}\frac{{d{v_1}}}{{dt}} + \frac{{{v_1} - {v_2}}}{1} = 0\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \to \,\,\,\frac{1}{2}\frac{{d{v_1}}}{{dt}} + 2{v_1} - {v_2} = 0\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,1 \\ <br /> \frac{{{v_2} - {v_1}}}{1} + \frac{1}{3}\frac{{d{v_2}}}{{dt}} = 0\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \to {v_1} = {v_2} + \frac{1}{3}\frac{{d{v_2}}}{{dt}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,2 \\ <br /> {\rm{Substitute }}{v_1}{\rm{ into equation 1:}} \\ <br /> \frac{1}{2}\left[ {\frac{{d{v_2}}}{{dt}} + \frac{1}{3}\frac{{{d^2}{v_2}}}{{d{t^2}}}} \right] + 2{v_2} + \frac{2}{3}\frac{{d{v_2}}}{{dt}} - {v_2} = 0\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \to \frac{1}{6}\frac{{{d^2}{v_2}}}{{d{t^2}}} + \frac{1}{2}\frac{{d{v_2}}}{{dt}} + \frac{2}{3}\frac{{d{v_2}}}{{dt}} + {v_2} = 0 \\ <br /> \frac{{{d^2}{v_2}}}{{d{t^2}}} + 7\frac{{d{v_2}}}{{dt}} + 6{v_2} = 0\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \to {\rm{let }}{v_2} = {e^{st}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \to {s^2}{e^{st}} + 7s{e^{st}} + 6{e^{st}} = 0 \\ <br /> {\rm{characteristic equation = }}{s^2} + 7s + 6 \to \,{\rm{ roots }} - 6{\rm{ and }} - 1 \\ <br /> {v_{2{\rm{natural}}}}(t) = A{e^{ - 6t}} + B{e^{ - t}} \\ <br /> {v_2}(t) = 5 + A{e^{ - 6t}} + B{e^{ - t}} \\ <br /> @t = 0\,\,{v_2}(0) = 0 = 5 + A + B\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \to A + B = - 5 \\ <br /> \frac{{d{v_2}}}{{dt}} = - 6A{e^{ - 6t}} - B{e^{ - t}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \to @t = 0\,\,\frac{{d{v_2}(0)}}{{dt}} = 0\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \to 0 = - 6A - B \\ <br /> - 6A - B = 0 \\ <br /> A + B = - 5\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \to A = 1,\,\,\,B = - 6 \\ <br /> {v_2}(t) = 5 + {e^{ - 6t}} - 6{e^{ - t}} \\ <br /> {\rm{ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - }} \\ <br /> {\rm{Find }}{v_0}{\rm{:}} \\ <br /> {{\rm{v}}_0} = {v_1} - {v_2} \\ <br /> {\rm{From equation 2: }}{v_1} = {v_2} + \frac{1}{3}\frac{{d{v_2}}}{{dt}} \\ <br /> {v_0} = {v_2} + \frac{1}{3}\frac{{d{v_2}}}{{dt}} - {v_2}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \to {v_0} = \frac{1}{3}\frac{{d{v_2}}}{{dt}} \\ <br /> {v_0}(t) = \frac{1}{3}\left( { - 6{e^{ - 6t}} + 6{e^{ - t}}} \right)\,\,\,\,\,\, \to {v_0}(t) = 2\left( {{e^{ - t}} - {e^{ - 6t}}} \right)V \\ <br /> \end{array}
 
You certainly seem to know what you're doing. I don't intend to check your math fully. What I did check was correct. I can help you verify your answer though since I have a 'cheat sheet' which lists the transfer function of your network, and with apologies I must use the Laplace transform method, so if you don't understand much of the following, don't be concerned. I am just trying to give you the answer I got & maybe something for you to look at later when you do hit transform methods.

V2/Vin = 1/[1 + (R1C1 + R2C2 + R1C2)s + R1C1R2C2s^2]

so your characteristic equation should be the denominator above set to zero, and it looks like it might just be!

Then a step input transforms to 5/s so
V2 = 5/s[1 + (R1C1 + R2C2 + R1C2)s + R1C1R2C2s^2].

However, you're asked to find V1-V2 which conveniently happens to be the current flowing into C2 multiplied by R2, so i = sC2V2 and

V1-V2 = iR2 = sC2R2V2 = 5R2C2/[1 + (R1C1 + R2C2 + R1C2)s + R1C1R2C2s^2].

This inverse-transforms to
V1-V2 = 5R2C2{1/(T1-T2)}[exp(-t/T1) - exp(-t/T2)] volts.

where T1 and T2 are the coefficients in the chas. equation:
(T1+s)(T2+s) = 1 + (R1C1 + R2C2 + R1C2)s + R1C1R2C2s2), T1, T2 > 0 and real. I'm leaving it up to you to solve the appropriate quadratic if you want.

Your answer is in the right form so other than a math mistake you're looking very good.
 
No worries. I typed out the maths for my own benefit more than anything else. Just as a learning tool.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K