Deriving Strain in Cantilever Beam with Known Deflection

AI Thread Summary
To derive the strain at the base of a cantilever beam with known deflection, the bending stress is expressed as Mc/I, leading to the strain formula Mc/IE. For a point load P, the strain can be represented as PL/IE, and using the moment-curvature relationship, the deflection y is derived as -PL^3/3EI. By solving for P and substituting it back, the strain is calculated as -3yc/L^2. This method, while specific to the case of a cantilever under a point load, is deemed appropriate for optimizing strain in a displacement transducer application to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio. The discussion confirms that the approach taken is valid, albeit seeking a more straightforward derivation.
randall016
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I am trying to derive the strain at the base of a cantilever beam with a known deflection. I know the bending stress is equal to Mc/I, so the strain is Mc/IE, where c is the distance from the neutral axis. For a point load ,P, the strain would then be PL/IE. Since the deflection is known I need to find the point load ,P, for that deflection. From the moment curvature relationship I can derive the deflection,y, to be equal to -PL^3/3EI. Solving for P and substituting it into the previous equation I can solve for the strain to be equal to -3yc/L^2.

This seems to be a roundabout way to solve for the strain. Is there a cleaner way to derive this relationship?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Strain can be positive or negative, positive at the outer fibers in tension and negative at the outer fibers in compression. Otherwise, your equation is very straightforward, provided you note, however, that the strain so derived is the strain at the outer fibers at the base of a cantilever under a point load P applied at the free end , where y is the deflection at that free end under the point load P. It is a very specific formula for a very specific case. The formula strain = Mc/EI is much more general.
 
So my approach is correct? Is there a better way to derive this relationship?
 
Since for whatever reason you want to find max strain as a function of max deflection, your approach is as good as it gets, since you have already calculated the deflection.
 
Alright thanks and the reason is for designing a displacement transducer. I know the working range so I want to optimize the strain in order to get the largest signal/noise ratio with a strain gauge.
 
Hi all, i have some questions about the tesla turbine: is a tesla turbine more efficient than a steam engine or a stirling engine ? about the discs of the tesla turbine warping because of the high speed rotations; does running the engine on a lower speed solve that or will the discs warp anyway after time ? what is the difference in efficiency between the tesla turbine running at high speed and running it at a lower speed ( as fast as possible but low enough to not warp de discs) and: i...
Back
Top