Deriving the atan2 Function from Tangent Half-Angle Formulas

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the atan2 function using tangent half-angle formulas. The formula presented is atan2(y, x) = 2arctan(y / (√(x² + y²) + x)). By substituting y = r sin(θ) and x = r cos(θ), the expression simplifies to sin(θ) / (1 + cos(θ)). This leads to the conclusion that this expression equals tan(θ/2), confirming the derivation of the atan2 function. The derivation process is clarified and validated through these mathematical transformations.
mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
Hello, it is mentioned http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atan2#Definition" that using the tangent half-angle formulas it is possible to express the function atan2 as:

\mathrm{atan2}(y,x)=2\mathrm{arctan}\frac{y}{\sqrt{x^2+y^2}+x}

How can I derive this result?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Put y = rsinθ, x = rcosθ, then y/(√(x2 + y2) + x) = sinθ/(1 + cosθ),

which you should be able to prove is tan(θ/2) :wink:
 
Thanks!
Now it´s clear where that formula came from.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top