Deriving the Gravitational Jerk Equation and Solving for Time and Position

  • Thread starter Thread starter MCarroll
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jerk
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving a function that expresses position in terms of time under gravitational acceleration. The Gravitational Jerk Equation is presented, but the user struggles to resolve it for time. They successfully derive a time function, t = -K * s * √(s₀ - s), but seek assistance in solving for separation, s. The conversation highlights the challenges of working with cubic equations resulting from squaring both sides and acknowledges the need for further mathematical understanding. Overall, the thread emphasizes the complexities of gravitational equations and invites constructive feedback on the derivations presented.
MCarroll
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Is anyone aware of a function expressesing position (separation) in terms of time, s=f(x), given only acceleration due to the force of gravity.

I am aware of the Gravitational Jerk Equation

J= \frac{2Gm}{s^{3}} \frac{ds}{dt}

where

m=mass of attracting object
G = gravitational constant

But I can't resolve this for t.

Although I have derived an equation giving dt = f(s) as

t = - \sqrt{\frac{2}{Gm}} * s *\sqrt{s_{0}-s}

given v(o) = 0 (start at rest)

where

s = instantaneous separation
s(o) = orignal separation

which for a given mass of attractor m simplifies to

t = - K * s *\sqrt{s_{0}-s}

I don't know how to solve this for s. Any thoughts?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
you don't know how to take the square of both sides? :confused:

although i don't understand how you derived that equation
 
I got some help on the Math forum so I think I am ok but I was not aware of the resolvant quadratic necessary to solve the cubic of s that results from squaring both sides. I should have mentioned my limited math ability in the first place.

I'll show my derivation of t = f(s) when I have some more time, welcoming all criticism.
 
Last edited:
EDIT/

here is what I have

s = s(o) - (at^2)/2 where v(0) = 0 and movement is in the negative direction with respect to scalar s(o).

2*(s_{0}-s) = - at^{2}

or

2*(s_{0}-s) = at^{2}

\sqrt{2*(s_{0}-s)} = t * \sqrt{a}

t = \sqrt{2*(s_{0}-s)/a}

but a = - Gm/(s^2), so

t = - \sqrt{\frac{2}{Gm}} * s *\sqrt{s_{0}-s}

please criticize.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top